Christa Pike, who survived Tennessee’s attempt to execute her by lethal injection a month ago, is speaking out for the first time, saying she is recovering, “but healing is not the same as being okay.”

“There hasn’t been a moment since that night when I haven’t been in pain. My body hurts. My arms hurt. My hands hurt. My throat hurts. I still struggle to speak,” Pike said in a written statement her attorneys say was dictated to them. “And the pain isn’t just physical. There is pain in my mind and in my soul.”

Pike, 50, was hospitalized after she survived two doses of pentobarbital as the state attempted to execute her on September 30 for the 1995 beating and stabbing death of classmate Colleen Slemmer. Soon after the failed procedure, Pike was on a ventilator, and her attorneys did not expect her to survive. But she woke up and later began talking and walking with assistance.

all 26 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 44 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

I think she’s earned life in prison at this point. They should stop trying.

She’s not innocent, she’s a murderer, but she also doesn’t deserve to be tortured by the state either. Life in prison.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 hours ago (1 child)

    That she is. She killed her at 19 years old, which is pretty young. In germany, it would be legal not to try her as an adult and she would not get capital punishment. Probably fifteen years and change and getting out if she can be rehabilitated after that. This is just cruel.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 4 hours ago

    She also tried to kill another prisoner several years after her initial crime. That's reason to believe she's more murderous than the average murderer and would present a danger to the public if released.

    Life in prison or a mental health facility seems like the only reasonable option to me unless she was able to present compelling evidence that she is no longer dangerous.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

    What's the legality with this ?

    Is she still going to be executed.....again?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago (1 child)

    This has happened before and the court ruled the person was still condemned to die, at least one person has been executed twice.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 minutes ago

    I thought I saw somewhere that it's something like 7 percent of the people fail to die from it. So if that's true and they gave her 2 doses that day and it didn't work, you'd imagine the population would think finding a different method would be the preferred way to move forward. Then again... Most people who don't believe in the death penalty likely wouldn't want to vote for a new method, thus making it those who don't want the death penalty, and those who don't care that they are tortured voting potentially for the same result. : /

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 5 hours ago (5 children)

    Americans can’t even execute people correctly anymore. They just torture them. I guess that’s the point?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

    You don’t get stats like these if it’s not the point:

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 5 hours ago (1 child)

    By and large that is the point. It's an extension of protestantism and Christian and abrahamic philosophy more broadly: a philosophical imagining that by creating pain in one place you undo pain in another.

    By engaging in a known wrong (murder), this somehow acts as a counterweight to some other known wrong (also murder).

    It's pretty juvenile.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 hours ago

    It's revenge, but it's also avoiding responsibility. The words say it, "sentenced to death, and may God have mercy on your soul". Everyone already lost. The victims. The murderer. Society. Killing doesn't solve anything, it doesn't deter more murders, it just removes them from being the state's problem.

    And it doesn't allow us to pursue the question everyone asks, why did this happen? Because they're dead.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 5 hours ago (10 children)

    She killed someone in 1995, what does executing her now and even failing at that to the point of torture accomplish, if premeditated murder is a crime than how is it okay for the government to do the same as a form of punishment, it feels barbaric and outdated. The only situation I can see it acceptable is if the person is found guilty beyond doubt and their continued existence poses a threat like terrorists who people might try to break out or people who can run their crimes even behind bars

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 hours ago

    The point of capital punishment is not justice. It is to "heal" the sovereignty of the state, which it deems to have been injured by behavior outside of it's control. First it's criminals killing innocent people, then what's next? The populace killing their oppressors? Honestly the same can be said about the politics surrounding abortion. They don't care that a pregnancy is terminated, they care that they had no say. The state are to be the only one's with the power to grant life or death. This is how you reconcile the logical inconsistency of the pro-life people being the same as the pro capital punishment people people. It's all about the sovereignty of the state. This, incidentally, is also the motivation behind Please Hangseth's attempt to reestablish public execution.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -5 points 5 hours ago (8 children)

    There is the tax burden of keeping murderers alive that nobody is really gonna be jumping out of their seat to pay… but even as much as I dislike the idea of paying for that burden, I dislike the idea of possibly killing an innocent person even more.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 4 hours ago (5 children)

    It's more expensive to execute someone than to have them serve life in prison.

    https://www.restonyc.com/is-it-cheaper-to-imprison-or-execute/

    The body of evidence overwhelmingly shows capital punishment cases cost substantially more than life imprisonment cases at every stage. While the moral and ethical efficacy of the death penalty may still be debated, from a practical cost perspective, the evidence clearly suggests it is much more expensive for taxpayers than sentencing convicts to life in prison without parole.

    https://sites.psu.edu/bleonard/2020/11/30/the-death-penalty-v-life-in-prison/

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324804378_The_Death_Penalty_vs_Life_Incarceration_A_Financial_Analysis

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 hour ago

    Well yea, the way they do it is beyond absurdly inefficient which can only be presumed for the sake of cruelty. Imo, it would generally more ethical and efficient to just shoot them rather than the insane bullshit the US does currently, and that’s coming from someone who doesn’t believe in the death penalty (other than for the most egregious of criminals).

    Don’t even get me started on spending life in a US prison though lol, I’d rather get shot than be effectively turned into state property that gets fed garbage for the rest of my life. At that point, it’s a decision between some of the most optimized soul-crushing torture in human history or being given an end that avoids possibly decades of suffering.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

    Don't worry, the guy you responded to doesn't want to follow the law and just wants to take people out back and shoot them in the head based on feels

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago (2 children)

    Lol don’t know where that was implied but sure

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 hours ago (1 child)

    a lot of prisoners work jobs while incarcerated but that is another can of worms, besides the argument that it takes money to keep prisoners alive so maybe let's just kill them instead is psychopathic, maybe if the system was designed towards rehabilitation instead of punishment and offered people support to begin with like free healthcare access, education and unemployment benefits, we would have less prisoners to begin with. Also if you read any news you'll find countless examples of innocent people getting thrown in jails because the corrupt pigs didn't want to bother doing their jobs or had a vendetta.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 5 hours ago

    I wouldn’t even give them the benefit of a doubt and call them jobs. Let’s be real: it’s generally forced, for-profit labor… AKA slavery. At least in the US.

    I totally agree with you for the most part about everything else you said though, I think it came off like I was trying to play the devil’s advocate? If anything, I was trying to say that even that argument doesn’t really warrant the continuation of these executions as it stands. Especially when it costs so much and is clearly so ineffective.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 3 hours ago

    What I want to know is "Will she hurt other people if released?" If she won't hurt anyone, let her out. If she will, keep her locked up. But there's no need to execute her. No good can come of it.

  • source