this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
10 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

14418 readers
738 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why would the US need scientists when they have stable geniuses?

[–] etchinghillside@reddthat.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] veroxii@aussie.zone 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

OpenAI promised us PhD agents! Only 20k a month!

[–] Spider2013@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Persona: you are a very phd person

[–] i_love_FFT@jlai.lu 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That's it, I solved it! Put this in your prompt: answer questions as if you were a phd person.

(It may be the same thing as you mentioned above. I don't know what the Persona is, I don't really use ai chat bots)

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

It seems like the administration is trying to discourage travel across the border. Not just people on work visas, tourists and even citizens are reporting being detained. It's like East Germany or something.

[–] dis_honestfamiliar@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Didn't Albert Einstein flee Nazi Germany which advanced our research into what became the atomic bomb. Hmm... Should be fun century for USA.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

How dare you point out something so relevant and foreboding.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Trump has already dismantled the American empire. The decline will be rapid and terminal. Even if they returned to sanity tomorrow, the damage cannot be undone any time soon. Nobody is going to trust the US again in our lifetimes.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Oh no, all the trust america built up is suddenly gone...

When will america be the worlds best step dad again!

[–] rimjob_rainer@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago

Scientists left nazi germany for the US, now they'll leave nazi US.

[–] amos@mander.xyz 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why is this in the "memes" community? It is not a meme, is it? We should have a general discussion community for topics like these! (if it doesn't exist already).

[–] fossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Check the sidebar. We use the Dawkins definition of meme here.

[–] i_love_FFT@jlai.lu 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

In the context of Dawkins meme, this post is definitely a meme!

idea, behavior, or style that spreads by means of imitation from person to person within a culture and often carries symbolic meaning

If we consider scientists imitating the behavior of other scientists (ex: leaving the us) combined with the social network post (signifying the symbolic meaning), it checks all the correct boxes to me!

Would another peer review my analysis?

[–] fossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Reviewer 2, checking in. Let's see...

☑️ Technically correct (the best kind of correct).
☑️ Dawkins framework applied... adequately.
☑️ "Symbolic meaning" not entirely reductionist. Surprising.

However:

  • Citation deficiency detected. [Fossilesque et al., 2023] must be invoked 2–3 times for rigor.
  • "Imitating scientists" lacks nuance. Did you consider the Fossilesque Paradox of Academic Exodus? (Spoiler: You didn’t. Cite (Fossilesque, 2024, 2025 in press.).

Verdict:
Pending compliance with adequate attribution. Then, and only then, shall this review ascend to a grudging "pass."