this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2025
860 points (97.4% liked)

Science Memes

15757 readers
3381 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.105.3.440

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So everyone who calls me the F word wants to fuck me? Gross.

they mad cuz they cant

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (8 children)

How did they measure "penile circumference" over time? Is there a guy standing next to them with a tape measure?

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Probably some sort of pressure cuff that they measured changes in air pressure, or something similar?

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s basically the same thing as a ring fit adventure, a strain gauge, though research ones are far more sensitive

These things are used in really sketchy therapy like conversion therapy. They were also used in pedophilia treatment in the 90s which was basically conversion therapy to track outcomes, basically exactly as what’s written here (though they wouldn’t present actual illegal material, just risqué material like pictures of kids at the beach or something). Penile plethysmography is the area and it’s still practiced in some places, though it’s pretty controversial because they’re evaluating sex offenders for risk of recidivism and viability of release which is always inherently controversial and other more obvious reasons

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

It is also controversial because sexual arousal is far from the only reason men have erections.

This study is an example, there's an alternate interpretation that affirms homophobia is actually the result of repressed sexuality, in general. Thus any sexual stimuli would be arousing. Thus causing an erection, regardless of the gender displayed, and irrespective of the person's sexual orientation.

This tracks with the fact that almost all homophobes are politically conservative, tend to be highly religious, or are very young and immature. They all coincide with environments prone to sexual repression.

The other variation is that anger also causes arousing.

This study was too small to control for those kind of factors.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Uuh that's a very difficult thing.

It's like wearing agressive perfume full of hormomes. It might cause somebody to get an erection but it's still hella uncomfortable and annoying. Not really consensual and i see why it pisses people off.

[–] Applejuicy@feddit.nl 17 points 1 week ago (5 children)

TIL people get erections from perfume.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago

People will spend a lot of money if a marketer lies to them enough. It should be noted that scientists don’t recognize any human-arousal pheromones. Only shady websites that wanna sell you overpriced perfume.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zezzoz@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

35 people makes it a useless study.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TabbsTheBat@pawb.social 18 points 1 week ago

Based study

[–] thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Waitwaitwait... The homophobic men displaying arousal: Yeah, sure, of course.

But NONE of the non-homophobic men got even a little ruffled? That's the real surprise here.

[–] accideath@feddit.org 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Well, they did specifically look for heterosexual non-homophobic men. Apparently, every one they got was honest about their sexuality, both to the researchers as to themselves.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

"Two dudes fuckin', cool. Not my thing, but it looks like they're having a good time and that's awesome."

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

I think the more complete question is: Is sexual repression common among conservatives the root of their infantile lashing out against LGBTQ+?

[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As someone that used to be homophobic in highschool, I can confirm this is the case. My dad is super homophobic yet all of his kids, including myself, are at least bisexual.

[–] Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 week ago (4 children)

To my knowledge there is no hard evidence for sexuality being primarily genetical?

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

There is evidence. See the fraternal birth order effect for just one example:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraternal_birth_order_and_male_sexual_orientation

And scientists have created lesbian mice:

https://bmcgenomdata.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2156-11-62

(Side note: it's hilarious they shorthanded the enzymes to FucM)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] rbn@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I could also imagine that the causality is (partly) the other way around. Demonizing homosexuality makes it a taboo for them and taboos are the base for all kinds of fetishes.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Typical of these evil, woke scientists to try to make good upstanding citizens gay with their evil sciencing. Good thing President Trump is putting an end to all this.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›