this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2025
224 points (94.8% liked)

politics

24613 readers
2282 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 36 points 14 hours ago

She's pretty close to the top of the list for the American Nuremberg trials.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 35 points 17 hours ago

Bondi didn't shut anything down, she just denied it because that's what Trump wants.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 46 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Did Musk not pay attention to the last 8 years of how the orange keeps dodging consequences?

It’s honestly his most impressive trait

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

It's got nothing to do with him, he's just a loser.

It's the cloud of losers around him, constantly embarrassing themselves, trying to help him, that off themselves constantly, in trying to help him for absolutely no gain or benefit that do it.

It's only a measure of how pathetic the Establishment Party types are.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Comedians used to joke how nothing could ever stick to Bill Clinton. Trump is making him look like an amateur.

[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 3 points 52 minutes ago

Slick Willy

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago

Yeah, in the case of Clinton, it was mostly about a stain on a dress, and everything else was one gigantic nothingburger, in spite of all the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy's efforts to make it otherwise...

The proto-qons and the proto-teabaggers (in their pupa phase between Bircher and teabagger/qanon nut) lost their fuckin' minds over both of the Clintons. Hillary drove them absolutely apeshit with being the stand-in for every 60s feminist they had hated for decades up to that point, and mostly because she did a bit more than just arrange flowers and have other women over for tea and meaningless meetings at the WH. And Bill drove them nuts for getting a blowjob.

It still makes me chuckle to think about how some of them got so grrr mad that Bill couldn't be removed for getting some lollipop love from Monica. One of them was huffing about this and squealed - "but Bill is MARRIED! This is infidelity!" I asked, "yeah, but is it illegal?" I've never seen one of these type look so impotent in my life when he sagged into his chair, red-faced with rage, and quietly said...."no".

[–] Bwoj@lemmy.world 104 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I find it weird, even comic, that musk feels the same impotent powerlessness in the face of trump’s perfidy as the rest of us.

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 47 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Not the same. He doesn't have to worry about loved ones getting kidnapped.

[–] Vorticity@lemmy.world 20 points 22 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 45 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, he never will. For his loved ones to be in danger he would need to be capable of feeling love in the first place.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 9 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

If trump/the fbi gave him a sufficiently exhaustive list of all of his children, I could see it. musk needs to get clean piss and spare organs from SOMEWHERE and it hurts his (father's) life goal of single handedly making the (white) human race significantly balder in future generations.

In all seriousness, the "noveau rich" (of which the child of an emerald mine owner considers himself to be part) tend to be obsessed with their children. They think they are feudal lords who are going to use their children as bargaining pieces. So they might openly hate their families even more than the "old money" families, but they consider them their strongest bargaining pieces. And since musk is both...

[–] EisFrei@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

You think there is a chance that he might actually fall in love with someone?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 13 hours ago

Until the ketamine wears off.

[–] SPRUNT@lemmy.world 9 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Ha! Joke's on you! Elon doesn't love anyone but himself, and I'm not even sure about that.

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

There's one thing I can think of that would solve all these problems for him

[–] SPRUNT@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

If you're talking about ketamine, he's waaaaayyyy ahead of you.

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Cmon man just OD already please, you know?

[–] SPRUNT@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

That's too easy. I want him to expose all the things and continue ramping his feud with Herr Führer until they both take each other, and all of their sycophantic supporters, out.

It's times like these I think back to when Saddam Hussain was captured and tried for crimes against humanity.....

[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 11 points 22 hours ago

I mean, he'll likely just make more. Pawns, really. Meat shields.

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 71 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

'big beautiful bill'

'big bomb'

Who is naming this shit?

And sorry Elon, I don't believe your sudden spin back into UBI after the whole DOGE saga, you're a POS.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 41 points 22 hours ago (8 children)

Oh he totally gives a shit about the people. The white people. The white male people who agree with him.

Drugs is a helluva drug

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 25 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Drugs I feel is a convenient excuse he's backspinning.

Plenty of people take drugs and don't decide to make DOGE.

Plenty of people in power do drugs and also didn't decide that DOGE was a good idea.

It's not drugs, it's not the result of them.

It's just him.

[–] athairmor@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

Decent person + drugs = fun/funny Insecure asshole + drugs = DOGE + Nazi salute + inflated ego.

Probably missing some terms but you get the idea.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago

It's not drugs, it's not the result of them.

They're affecting him and his decisions. How they are is open to debate. If you're nodding out on camera in the Oval Office, maybe you have a problem.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 hours ago

He's using those people. He doesn't give a shit about them.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Like I keep saying, the cons are very weird and are very keen on the baby talk (meaningless and completely undefined googoo/gaagaa words like "maga", "maha", "big beautiful bill", and just about everything out of Taco's mouth on virtually any topic), although "big bomb" is just being kind of bombastic in my view and is less baby talk.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 hours ago

Trump is illiterate and has advanced dementia, so it makes sense.

[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 73 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I thought the list was sitting on her desk waiting to be reviewed prior to release?

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 47 points 23 hours ago

Once you redact all/most of the names, there's no real list anymore.

[–] thedruid@lemmy.world 49 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Then tell us what you know elon

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 43 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Literally nothing that everyone doesn't already know - that Trump was super close with Epstein for years and is obviously a predator.

The evidence is already public, making noise about one list is a waste of time.

[–] RadicalEagle@lemmy.world 15 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Exactly. I’d also say that evidence of Trump’s crimes don’t matter to the people who support him because his crimes don’t matter to the people who support him.

[–] Geobloke@aussie.zone 1 points 4 hours ago

Well how many would trust Elon over Donald

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 17 hours ago

Conservative morality is generally based on one's place in the hierarchy. They see him as a moral person for being higher in the hierarchy than them, actions don't come into account.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 15 points 23 hours ago

The same thing he always knew, nothing.

[–] EarthshipTechIntern01@lemmy.world 14 points 20 hours ago

Stupid story from a shoddy source.

Clickbait ineptitude dominates News

[–] dhhyfddehhfyy4673@fedia.io 18 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

But the administration has now confirmed there’s no evidence

Oh, well I guess that's case closed then. lol

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 5 points 17 hours ago

They'd never lie!

[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 7 points 19 hours ago

why is Rawstiry accepted as a source here?

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 5 points 22 hours ago

Clickbait article. This is nothing.

load more comments
view more: next ›