this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
317 points (97.3% liked)

politics

24686 readers
2956 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Paywall removed https://archive.is/UnSQN

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 minutes ago

They’re not idiotic, they have to pretend to do something opposing the Republicans while they help them transfer all the wealth to the rich and start imperial wars around the world, otherwise normal people might catch on and do something about it.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 11 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Is it time yet to consider a 3rd party?

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 2 points 27 minutes ago

Always will be.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today -1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Why not? Every Sociopathic Oligarch is starting their own. I'm sure they'd love to ~~enslave~~ have you.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 95 points 11 hours ago (15 children)

People always say the Democrats are out of touch. While that is certainly true, that's not the real issue here. The Democrats know perfectly well what they would have to do to defeat Trump. It's blindingly obvious, after all. The point is they don't want to do any of those things.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 28 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

It's partly that, but it's also that doing what Democrats want never seems to get the turnout that it should.

Biden did student loan forgiveness, which should have given him all the college votes, yet people shurg and go "Well yea! About time!"

He puts money into infrastructures and unions and again, people go "I guess, it's a bit better than Republicans!"

Democratic voters suck ass at rallying behind any cause, because the base is filled with "well actually...!" people, that demand 100% problem completion on day one, otherwise they are not impressed.

And even if he solved every problem ever, they'd say, "Well yea, he should fix them... He caused most of them!"

Meanwhile, Republican voters will literarily vote for a rapist because they see the bigger picture. For as stupid as they are, they understand you have to be IN POWER to do anything.

Twirling your thumb in your asshole pining about raising taxes and fist past the post and equality for all and protecting minorities is a colossal waste of time if you don't VOTE.

[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

The other thing I've noticed with Democrats (actually pretty much any group left of the Republicans) is that they'll splinter off into a dozen different groups at the drop of a hat and all infight with each other harder than they'll fight their actual opponents.

The hard right is so effective IMO because they'll glom together with people they don't 100% agree with to push things in the general direction they want before they start arguing about the details.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 17 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Biden did student loan forgiveness, which should have given him all the college votes, yet people shurg and go “Well yea! About time!”

He dithered and only reluctantly did this. And then when he did, he did it in a way that a corrupt SCOTUS could overrule. There were other paths he could have taken, but he chose the least-confrontational approach and ultimately the court negated most of his efforts. His fault or not, very few people actually ended up getting their loans forgiven. If he failed to consider a hostile SCOTUS in his plans, then that is a strategic failure on his part.

He puts money into infrastructures and unions and again, people go “I guess, it’s a bit better than Republicans!”

His infrastructure bills are currently being torn to pieces as they were slow to actually spend their money. They were mired in everything bagel liberalism. A thousand requirements for dollar spent meant to solve every social ill under the Sun. But regardless, these bills didn't directly help individuals. They may be necessary to curb the rise of China, but that's not something that affects people's lives directly. Unionization? Biden was unable to stem the decline in union numbers, and he himself chose to be a strikebreaker.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

He dithered and only reluctantly did this. And then when he did, he did it in a way that a corrupt SCOTUS could overrule. There were other paths he could have taken, but he chose the least-confrontational approach and ultimately the court negated most of his efforts.

I'm gonna gut check this, because I remember him trying couple of times to work out student debt relief. Also, what other steps would you have taken to get student debt relief/forgiveness pushed though? The only step I can think of is after the "president is a king" SCOTUS ruling he could have just canceled them and told everyone to fuck off, but using those powers was clearly something that he didn't morally agree with.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

He picked the weakest method to start with, added many delays and means testing, then after being told no by Supreme Court just changed to going through the backlog of those who should have already been forgiven and called it him fulfilling his campaign promises.

Then on top of that allowed gop to force them to restart.

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Exactly. And ultimately, voters don't want to hear excuses. They don't expect perfection, but they do expect some results. Republicans, even with limited majorities, always manage to achieve at least some of what they would call progress. Democrats OTOH just fine endless excuses. At some point, you're either incompetent or admitting to your voters that you were lying to them - promising them something you would never be able to deliver.

[–] TheCleric@lemmy.org 27 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (10 children)

Eh. I get what you’re saying, but so much of the disillusionment from the potential dem base is coming from their constant promises and constantly arriving at the obvious conclusion decades late and then acting like they’re the most progressive politician in human history. While in reality it’s a half step toward the policies we should’ve enacted forty years ago.

It’s not that people are like “so what.” It’s the deep seeded knowledge in all of us that the party will try to throw us crumbs and claim like they’ve always been on our side and are the most righteous policy makers that are saving us, when in reality they’re walking hand in hand with people that are pushing us to absolute limit of barely acceptable and then dangling what they’ve known they should’ve done forever ago in front of us when we’re finally at our breaking point.

They don’t care about us. They’re not beholden to us, and it shows. They’re beholden to money and are performatively throwing us scraps when they have an opponent so far right that it’s literally the threat of fascism. And they are very much responsible for the continued rightward march of the entire country.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world -1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

I think a big issue is people expect democrats to enact the thing's they promise to enact and then they don't. And there's insane coping and denial used to justify it instead of allowing real critique.

Biden did student loan forgiveness,

Biden tried, no loans were forgiven, some loans were forced to be more ethical, but nobody was freed from the debt.

So that isn't seen as a win by a lot of people who wanted loan forgiveness and got a half assed attempt that didn't help.

Hell, he said he would forgive all student loans and make college free. Lol

He puts money into infrastructures and unions and again, people go "I guess, it's a bit better than Republicans!"

Again, this isn't really as true as I wish it was.

They put money into green energy corporations that hoard it offshore like other corps.

And Biden literally fought against unions while in office.

Democratic voters suck ass at rallying behind any cause, because the base is filled with "well actually...!" people, that demand 100% problem completion on day one, otherwise they are not impressed.

I try really really hard to not be contrarian about this shit, but Democrats aren't making partial progress on anything, they are failing to make positive meaningful change for working class people at the expense of the rich, which is a requirement for fixing wealth inequality, which is the source of the vast majority of economic and societal issues. Until Democrats are willing to force their rich owners to make concessions they will not be capable of supporting these kinds of policies.

Also blaming voters for the outcome of an election is not valid, it's up to politicians to provide something worth voting for and being capable of communicating those policies to their target voters.

Meanwhile, Republican voters will literarily vote for a rapist because they see the bigger picture.

Republicans vote for strongmen because their religious upbringing makes them subservient to anyone who can imitate the way their pastor made them feel.

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 1 points 49 minutes ago

Biden tried, no loans were forgiven, some loans were forced to be more ethical, but nobody was freed from the debt.

Factually untrue. My loans got forgiven.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›