So the software cannot improve making connections between information, only just be fed more data.. I'm ignorant about how this works but that somewhat sounds like giving up.
this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
2 points (100.0% liked)
Technik
715 readers
44 users here now
die Community für alles, was man als Technik beschreiben kann
the community for everything you could describe as technology
Beiträge auf Deutsch oder Englisch
Posts in German or English
founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
That's all LLMs could ever do. This was never the path to generalized AI in the colloquial sense.
I don't think it is fair to say that. LLMs in the current form, or by themselves cannot do better. Does not mean, that this basis can be further evolved to do better. But that requires good research, and a lot of open source to cross check and evolve. There is no "business case" in that. Hoarding resources and knowledge and keeping other people from it on the other hand, is something the MBAs understand.
I'm fine with this as long as everyone else gets the same rights and piracy stops being a crime. I'm so tired of corporation and rich people getting away with stuff that results in hefty fines or even prison for the common person.
I have a better idea let's sue them collectively for trillions in damages. Let's kill AI entirely. We need to be fixing our climate not fulfilling the dreams of scifi nerds.
As a scifi nerd, I doubt these guys actually read scifi.
What a bunch of whiny children these CEOs are. It reminds me of screaming children at the grocery store who didn't get something they wanted.
And yet, in all the CEO books, they talk about disruptive innovation, and how a “change in the rules” creates new opportunities.
Sam Altman is nothing more than a copyright violator (the courts like the term pirate) who should owe billions, if not trillions in legal penalties.
In a way Sam Altman becomes rich using the pirated data collected by Aaron Swartz. One gets to be an oligarch and the other is bullied into suicide.