this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2025
517 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

485 readers
398 users here now

Share interesting Technology news and links.

Rules:

  1. No paywalled sites at all.
  2. News articles has to be recent, not older than 2 weeks (14 days).
  3. No videos.
  4. Post only direct links.

To encourage more original sources and keep this space commercial free as much as I could, the following websites are Blacklisted:

More sites will be added to the blacklist as needed.

Encouraged:

Misc:

Relevant Communities:

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world 78 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Pornography and violence or whatever are being age gated in the corporate web but the biggest players get to sell sex chats to kids. Pedophilia is legal as long as there is ad revenue to be made.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 52 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Neil, you’re welcome here on the Fediverse.

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 39 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
[–] baconmonsta@piefed.social 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago

I guess he really needed the $1.39 he was getting every year from them.

[–] Chev@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What's the context? Haven't heard about Meta anything in a while.

[–] Pro@programming.dev 58 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)
[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 29 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

When I read the headlines about this initially yesterday I was like ‘oh, is this a conservative thing where they’re mad about kids asking the chat bot questions about sex?’

So I read the examples, and HOLY SHIT it is so not that! There is no way to describe it except erotic roleplay that is explicitly about children.

Given the prompt examples I am skeptical that any child would write them, they sound more like shit they grabbed off some pedo ERP site.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 weeks ago

Pedophiles do Enterprise Resource Planning?

[–] jahayk@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Neil has never resembled a Conservative. When he holds a position you can assume it's backed by facts.

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 weeks ago

Honestly I’m not familiar with him (I’m fairly musically ignorant), it was just my initial doubt because that’s the form of ‘think of the children!’ that I’m most familiar with. But damn, sometimes you really do have to think of them, because those examples were disturbing.

[–] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 weeks ago

My only real knowledge of him, aside from some songs I'm sure I've heard, is the line from sweet home alabama. And when I read about what that was about, I kinda came down on neil's side.

[–] Quibblekrust@thelemmy.club 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It sounds like some idiot working at Meta used an LLM to produce that internal document. Those "acceptable things to say" quotes are just stupid. They have to be quotes an LLM added to the document, unnoticed. There's no way a human wrote them, or even copied and pasted into the doc, and said, "These are acceptable." I refuse to believe that.

[–] puppinstuff@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 weeks ago

Neil Young is very vocal about leaving platforms he somehow finds his way back to when people aren’t paying attention. I don’t disagree in this case but it’s not exactly a barometer of artists in general.

[–] itisileclerk@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

He is Young and he has every right to leave. AI is dumb and may start conversation with him.

[–] tgcoldrockn@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

better decades late than never, i suppose

[–] Therobohour@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Good for him

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

I'm surprised he was on those platforms in the first place. Kneel Young.

[–] ScintillatingStruthio@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Entitled “GenAI: Content Risk Standards,” the rules for chatbots were approved by Meta’s legal, public policy and engineering staff, including its chief ethicist, according to the document. Running to more than 200 pages....

They probably just asked AI to summarize it for them and never read it.