this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2025
426 points (99.1% liked)

Not The Onion

17820 readers
1404 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/34639023

Another Case

The British government proscribed Palestine Action as a terrorist group on 5 July 2025 under the UK's Terrorism Act 2000 after members of the network vandalised RAF aircraft at Brize Norton.[12] Since then, British police have arrested 744 individuals for showing support to Palestine Action, many of these resulting from a sit-in on Parliament Square on 9 August 2025.[13][14] Civil liberties groups have criticised the ban as "conflating protest with terrorism."[15]

all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lmdnw@lemmy.world 106 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What a couple of pudding-brained stooges these pigs are.

[–] ThinkBeforeYouPost@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago

Well, the Venn Diagram of Sherlock fucking Holmes and Constable Cadets is a two ring circus.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 91 points 1 week ago

When you create stupid laws expect stupid results.

[–] graycube@lemmy.world 75 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 85 points 1 week ago (3 children)

About five minutes later, the arresting officer approached him again. “He said: ‘I’ve got good news and I’ve got bad news.’ I said: ‘What’s the good news?’ He said: ‘I’m de-arresting you.’

“And I said: ‘What’s the bad news?’ He said: ‘It’s going to be really embarrassing for me.’ And then I walked free, while all the real heroes are the people that are actually getting arrested.”

At least the cop wasn’t a total ass about it.

I think the UK government is being incredibly stupid and fascist lately with shit like this.

[–] Railing5132@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hey, if it was the US, due would be chewing on concrete with 3 or 4 'roided up cops yelling: "stop resisting!" while kneeling in his neck. I'm not saying the fascism shown here is cute but at least it isn't so comically over-the-top as it is on this side of the pond.

[–] Cypher@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Yes it’s a less aggressive form but it’s far more insidious because people are less likely to resist it.

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hearing a cop admitting wrong feels like a fantasy in the US

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah in the US, they would have beat the shit out of him for daring to mock them with a shirt. Then arrest him for resisting.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The arrest would be the embarrassing part either way. You cannot define terrorism in a way that does not make it a matter of perspective.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes you can. Problem for governments is that they usually are terrorists by the typical definitions of using violence to further political goals.

In particular the UK is heavily involved in the terror genocide against Gaza as it facilitates arms transfers from the US to Israel and runs spy flights over Gaza to help the Israelis find civilians to murder. They recently went to pay American contractors with British tax money to hide the fact that they continue their direct intelligence support to the genocide.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I can't help but notice you did not provide a definition of terrorism that is not based on perspective.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

using violence to further political goals.

Unless you want to go down the road of saying that every word and thereby every definition is a matter of perspective, i fail to see how this definition is "based on perspective".

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ok America every way after WW2 has been to further economic interests in the area. Israel itself is formed on the back of horrific terrorism and outright murders.

So can a terrorist nation define another as a terrorist? As such could that definition not apply to literally every nation in the eyes of another? The word terrorist is useless, sandwich tosser terrorist, sandal thrower terrorist. It's meaningless.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 0 points 1 week ago

I agree that the use by states is hypocritical and the designation currently is meaningless.

But the definition in itself is relevant imo. to call out states when they engage in terror, which many, but not all, do.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Sort of, he was arrested and then de-arrested, and then began selling the shirt online.

[–] unconsequential@slrpnk.net 62 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I am so SCARED. I mean just LOOK at this guy. Look at his socks! He’s clearly out to menace society. Phew. So glad those officers were there to set him straight and give him a good scolding. What would we do without these sorts of laws?! Society would just collapse. I’m sure of it.

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 27 points 1 week ago

Fascists don't think, they do! The fact they're doing the wrong things don't matter to them just so long as they can tell themselves they're "doing something about 'the problem' (that they made up in their heads)."

[–] riskable@programming.dev 43 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It's not like they have mobile phones and could just look up what plasticine is!

[–] FuyuhikoDate@feddit.org 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Never do that... It melts their Brains when the need To learn something... Learned that the hard way, when i has to deal with cops ☹️

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 8 points 1 week ago

OPPRESS or ...learn stuff? Pfft

[–] sturger@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

I thought maybe ’plasticine’ was a reference to plastic explosives, but one web search and hey! I’m less ignorant than I was 2 minutes ago!

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Made me think of Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds

Picture yourself on a train in a station

With plasticine porters with looking glass ties

Suddenly someone is there at the turnstile

The girl with kaleidoscope eyes

(Definitely not about LSD, guys, really! Lol)

[–] pootzapie@lemy.lol 37 points 1 week ago

It’s very cute that the cop on left is so unsure he needed to hold hands while they waited, it’s the personal touches really!

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So any words close to the Palestine Action is illegal?! Lol so laws against grammar.

[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 23 points 1 week ago

They're anti-semantic

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 13 points 1 week ago

That is the purpose. Create ambiguous rules to justify authoritarian crackdowns.

[–] FuyuhikoDate@feddit.org 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I dont get it... Whats the Problem with the shirt?

[–] miss_demeanour@piefed.ca 46 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Assuming you're genuine and not /s:

The UK has proscribed Palestine Action as a terrorist....

The British government proscribed Palestine Action as a terrorist group on 5 July 2025 under the UK's Terrorism Act 2000 after members of the network vandalised RAF aircraft at Brize Norton.[12] Since then, British police have arrested 744 individuals for showing support to Palestine Action, many of these resulting from a sit-in on Parliament Square on 9 August 2025.[13][14] Civil liberties groups have criticised the ban as "conflating protest with terrorism."[15]

[–] FuyuhikoDate@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago

First thank you and yeah... Political i am living under a rock... (I know not the best thing To do today) but there thing is that it is clearly a different word which exists and that made me wonder...

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 37 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The direct action protest group 'Palestine Action' broke into a UK air force base and spray painted some slogans on some planes.

The UK government decided to prove American conservatives right about them having free speech issues by labelling the organization a terrorist organization (same level as ISIS, Boko Haram, etc) which makes showing support for them a criminal offense for supporting terrorism, with protesters holding Palestine Action signs facing years of jail time.

The UN has called the move a gross over reaction and violation of human rights. Since then there have been hundreds of arrests of people protesting in support of Palestine Action.

This logo looks very similar to the Palestine Action one.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Meanwhile actual neo nazi group combat 18 is perfectly legal to join

[–] FuyuhikoDate@feddit.org 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Nazis arent as Bad as people who glue themself To the Street To Protest... /s (Context: in germany we allow facists political parties [again] while Protestes like "letzte Generation" simliar To fridays for future, get threated like terrorists...

[–] Texas_Hangover@lemmy.radio 20 points 1 week ago

The Brits sense of humor in the face of apocalyptic fuckery is top notch I tell you what.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

"Oi do you have certificate of registration for that t-shirt lad? Careful he is holding a butter knife!"

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 7 points 1 week ago
[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Vandalism was enough for them to outlaw the whole group? How many of those 744 were vandals?

Probably wouldn't see the same with roles reversed