this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2025
6 points (87.5% liked)

Showerthoughts

33256 readers
579 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

In theory there's no difference between theory and practice, but in practice there is.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

So say we all.

SO SAY WE ALL!

[–] seven_phone@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Consensus is the instinctive collective response of the mind to the world whereas truth is its regimented output. This is most obvious in the evolution of language, the truth in this instance is things like definitions, syntax and grammar but this is all after the event and looking back explanation. The real growth of language is from consensus. The definition of the word gay in original form by etymology was carefree and happy which is it's truth but by consensus of usage it was altered to mean homosexuality, which is an entirely separate definition. The consensus idea very easily overran that of truth and became what is real.

[–] massacre@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

So say we all!

[–] Opinionhaver@feddit.uk 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Argumentum ad populum, the fallacy that if most people agree, they must be correct.

We're tribal animals. Going against the group is usually a bad survival tactic - but just because you echo the beliefs of those around you doesn't mean they're right. Very few of history's great philosophers held popular beliefs, yet we still remember their names. Nobody remembers the conformists.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

The opposite is also dangerous, i.e. believing reflexively in heterodoxies and conspiracy theories. But your point stands.

[–] toofpic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"Millions of flies can't be wrong!"

[–] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

The flies aren't wrong. Eating shit is good FOR THEM but it would not be good for humans

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

That raises the question of if you're another fly or another human.

[–] iii@mander.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

Speak for yourself

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Yeah, you are right. Too many people in the sciences believe this as well. Science is about repeatability and falsifiable hypothesis...

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yes but it's worth pointing out that peer review is also a form of consensus-building. It's not a perfect process, but it's pretty workable if everyone's pulling in the same direction.

[–] CM400@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Isn’t it the case that “consensus” in the sciences is just a shorthand for “we agree that this is most likely to be true”?

If I were conversing with a scientist and I asked about possibility x, and they disagreed with it for the reason that “the consensus is…”, I would assume that they are not saying possibility x is wrong, but rather that they would need really good evidence to agree that x is correct.