They are only sorry the fans saw right through their plan. There's no reason to increase the price on old digital content.
post
Payday 3 didn't make enough money, so they're following the players back to Payday 2 to try to shake them down there.
What a sad decline for such a great dev :c
Starbreeze rolling back bad decisions and pretending they didn't know? What is this? A Tuesday?
payday still exists? I haven't heard of the game in years. I'm surprised they even attempted this as a whole because it sounds like it's only going to piss off their remaining userbase.
BEING SAID, I think their main issue here isn't the fact that the price went up in the first place, it's that they decided to make it almost 25% more as the increase after having it be ~52% off for ages. This rollup should have defo been more gradual if they wanted people to not be pissed about that. An instant 50$ increase in price is a tough amount to swallow for a 12 year old game, regardless of if DLC is involved, even moreso when it boosts the price to $170
Maybe an unpopular opinion, but I actually like these "DLC Subscription" type things, particularly for older games with tons of DLC. There's a huge barrier to entry for someone trying to pick up an older game, and being able to pay $5 or $10 and 'demo' all of the DLC for a month is a nice way to see what's worth buying or if the game is even going to have enough longevity to make buying the DLC worth it.
Obviously when it's accompanied by a huge increase in the price of the DLC, it sours it considerably, but at its core, the subscription itself is not a bad thing.
Yeah, i agree on that; when i heard that i thought about jumping in for a month and playing it again; it actually is pretty fun, but it's simply too expensive to buy in. I would be happy if other games with lots of DLC or expensive DLC considered something similar; Paradox games are the first thing that come to mind, but there's other stuff like Rimworld where you can drop 100 Bucks on expansions that i simply do not have.
Someone I know wanted a recommendation for a multiplayer game recently. One of the games I remembered existing was Payday 2. DLC and subscriptions involved? Never-fuckin-mind.
You boycott a game because it has DLC? That's silly. Especially for PD2 which developed over years and added many times the content of the base game. And if you want to play a DLC mission you don't even need the DLC; only the host needs it.
IMO paydays DLC policy was and is generally good. Recent price changes non-included.
I do, because it broadly displays a bad approach. If a thing should be in the game, it should just be in the game. There is no reason the developer has to gate things behind a payment. Terraria, Minecraft, Stardew, and so many others, all managed to keep adding content without pretending that DLC was anything more than a way to pay out for shareholders. The invasion of microtransactions into gaming has been nothing but harmful, deceptive, and malignant, and I refuse to participate.
all 10 comments