this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
697 points (99.0% liked)

politics

23388 readers
3624 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 4 points 2 hours ago

so this is what he meant by eliminated world hunger, by killing them directly or indirectly.

[–] brisk@aussie.zone 23 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

How many children died because Bill Gates lobbied for the Oxford Covid-19 vaccine to be patented?

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

Gates is always whitewashing his own future or past actions when he does something philanthropic tbh

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 2 hours ago

i heard about that, he advocated for expensive equipment, medicaiton only produced by the us.

[–] JacksonLamb@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago

This. Thank you.

That was a villain level move from Gates. The behaviour of the rich nations towards the LICs over covid vaccines was absolutely shameful and destroyed the illusion of Gates' benevolence.

[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 19 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I really do think it would be fun to compile all of the billionaires in the world and just have them fight to the death in a gladiator kind of rig. Would be awesome.

[–] Sarmyth@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

I feel like the only way it would work is if they got to keep the money of whoever they killed as long as that person had over a billion dollars... and I would almost be OK with that.

I like to imagine it would reduce the collateral damage the rest of society faces when these people have a dick waving contest.

Roided out billionaires with their hearts exploding out their chests from experimental steroids would really mix things up in a good way. He'll maybe we'd get some truly sick cybernetic out of it too.

[–] minkymunkey_7_7@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Kat and Kropp get in an argument over the war as they rest from an hour’s worth of drill (occasioned by Tjaden’s not saluting a major properly). Kat believes the war would be over if leaders gave all the participants “the same grub and the same pay,” as he says in a rhyme. Kropp believes the leaders of each country should fight each other in an arena to settle the war; the “wrong” people currently do the fighting.

Erich Maria Remarque - All Quiet on the Western Front 1929

[–] selkiesidhe@lemm.ee 12 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Sounds more like someone has seen the world turning on the worthless shit that are billionaires NOT that someone has seen the light and wants to make the world a better place...

[–] Viper_NZ@lemmy.nz 19 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Credit where credit is due, Bill Gates has been putting his money where his mouth is for decades now.

[–] Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world 12 points 6 hours ago

Yeah, TBF that foundation has done a lot of good.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 11 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (3 children)

We don't don't need princes or kings doing PR. If we taxed billionaires out of existence we could fund that and so much more. This guy doesn't get to make up for whatever he was doing on Epstein's plane, at least not without coming clean first.

[–] Viper_NZ@lemmy.nz 1 points 3 hours ago

We could do so much more, but would we? USAID was just shuttered. There's every chance that money would go into the military industrial complex or something equally unpleasant.

Not defending billionaires as a concept (they shouldn't exist, and most aren't as philanthropic as Bill), but I will acknowledge he's doing a lot of good with his money.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] seeigel@feddit.org 28 points 10 hours ago

No need for envy. He owns enough farmland that he can easily top Musk by rising prices to let many more children starve to death.

[–] the_q@lemm.ee 56 points 12 hours ago (23 children)

Remember there are no good billionaires. No amount of "good" they do will ever be enough.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 142 points 15 hours ago (19 children)

Cool story, Bill. Who did you donate to? Why did you cut your philanthropic efforts to fight climate change and disease? Why have you and your buddies fought for minimizing and coopting government for years? Bill isn't innocent in all this, it's just a good time to blame Elon. Don't get me wrong, Elon 100% deserves it, but that doesn't mean that Bill isn't playing the PR game here.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 112 points 14 hours ago (6 children)

Why did you cut your philanthropic efforts to fight climate change and disease? Why have you and your buddies fought for minimizing

The problem is that billionaires should not exist but come on. $80 billion already donated. $7 Billion more just for Africa. Hundreds of millions in malaria research.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/carlieporterfield/2022/11/17/bill-gates-foundation-pledges-7-billion-to-support-africa-health-and-agriculture/

Could he do more? Sure. But attacking someone who is doing a little because he isn't doing more doesn't seem fair.

Years ago Elon said he was disappointed when he met Bill Gates because Gates only wanted to talk about philanthropy and climate.

[–] JacksonLamb@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

The problem is that billionaires should not exist but come on. $80 billion already donated. $7 Billion more just for Africa. Hundreds of millions in malaria research.

Philanthropists hoarding wealth and resources and then getting to choose which of the poors to allow to have any is actually part of the problem, even if it makes you feel good.

We saw that when Gates leveraged his contributions to force a vaccine that had been developed with public money for the benefit of humankind, to become patent locked and hard for the Third World to access or afford.

[–] audaxdreik@pawb.social 46 points 13 hours ago (6 children)

The problem is that the theft begins by simply becoming a billionaire in the first place. You don't get to be one by playing nice and not exploiting a lot of people and rules along the way. Sure the government could be blamed some for not having enough regulations in place to prevent/stop that, but capitalism ensures that businesses exploit any available loophole possible to maximize profit, otherwise you're a bad business.

While I can respect a lot of those philanthropic efforts, those should not be his decisions alone to make. That money should've been paid into taxes and distributed in agreed upon ways. $7 Billion dollars to Africa is just great, but it could do a lot of help here, too. I have no issues with sending $7B to Africa, but that sure seems like something the people should agree upon first, through some sort of national aid, and not as an effort to spare the conscience of an aging billionaire.

Fuck all billionaires. Every. Last. One. Forever.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 26 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

The problem is that the theft begins by simply becoming a billionaire in the first place.

That's why that was my first sentence!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Chastity2323@midwest.social 15 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (4 children)

While I can respect a lot of those philanthropic efforts, those should not be his decisions alone to make. That money should've been paid into taxes and distributed in agreed upon ways.

As a capitalist, all of his solutions are capitalist. His efforts to slow climate change are primarily technological, with a focus on unproven horseshit like carbon capture rather than proven improvements like better, less car centric urban planning and reducing meat intake. He would never even consider an strategy of economic degrowth to fight climate change even though available evidence shows that that is exactly what we need.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 13 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Pretty sure he doesn't care

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 10 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Or he considers that a good thing. It's more likely that you think.

He's a breeder and a eugenicist. He believes the strong/successful should reproduce (how many kids does he have now?) and those less fortunate should die off.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Well he can't exactly kill the world 's richest, can he? Its a stronger indictment about the risks of wealth inequality than about the morality of the rich.

[–] galoisghost@aussie.zone 38 points 14 hours ago (12 children)

So are you Bill. You utter piece of shit.

Fuck all Billionaires

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 30 points 14 hours ago

"I haven't killed as many kids in so short a timeframe," is the implication here.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 49 points 15 hours ago
load more comments
view more: next ›