this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

Ask Lemmy

36629 readers
1001 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Rules: explain why

Ready player one.

That has to be one of the cringiest movies I've seen, is tries so hard, too hard with it's "WE LOVE YOU NERD, YOU'RE SO COOL FOR PLAYING GAMES AND GETTING THIS 80S REFERENCE" message and the whole "corporation bad, the people good" narrative seems written for toddlers... The fan service feels cheap and adds nothing to the story.

Finally, they trying to make the people believe that very attractive girl with a barely visible red tint spot on her face is "ugly"... Like wtf?

Yet it received decent reviews plus being one of the most successful movies of that year.

all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Lord of the Rings.

I understand and respect the seminal role LotR (Book) has as a fantasy work. I have to, as a fantasy nerd myself.

I also believe that those three movies that everyone loves could be edited down into one and not much would be lost.

God DAMN do those films drag ON and ON and ON.

The books, too, drag on like Tolkien was being paid by the individual word. Thankfully with books I can set the pace at which things go.

[–] frank@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Interstellar. That ending was so unbelievably dumb that I can't even stomach the rest of the movie thinking about it.

I know it's got rave reviews, a stacked cast, Nolan directing. Plenty was pretty, cool concepts, high stakes scenes. But that ending... shudders

[–] sorrowl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

honestly, i disagree. i really don't see the big problems with the ending. i actually even like it.

the library (called a tesseract in the movie) is constructed by the future humans, who have control of 5d space, and who include Murphy, who actually lived in the room connected to the tesseract. it's built to look like that, so Cooper, a 3d being, can actually understand it. it's basically stretching out time and gravity into a 3d space. the library is not something the black hole made up because Cooper loves Murphy (which i thought what happened on my first watch), it's what the future humans made with the help of the black hole. love ties thematically into it, 'cause Cooper loves and knows Murphy so well, he knows how to tell her the quantum data from the black hole, or something. and Cooper, or the future humans for that matter, can't say or do anything directly, 'cause in the past, they're only able to affect gravity (and because of the construction of the tesseract, Cooper can only control the gravity of that one room.) the reason for why the future humans don't go just directly do it themselves is explained as them not being able to pinpoint a specific space, or time for it, which is why Cooper, who can traverse the tesseract for a specific point in time and space in that room to tell Murphy the quantum data, which allows the future humans to do all of the crazy 5d stuff.

anyway, sorry for the rambling. Interstellar is my favourite movie, and i really love even the ending of it. multiple scenes, including the ending, make me bawl like a baby, like no other movie has done to me, and i love all the hard sci-fi it has. sci-fi so hard, that physicists learned something new about black holes, because of the equations used to make the black hole cgi in it.

[–] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

If you think Ernest Cline's movie is cringy, wait until you read his poetry. Absolutely one of the worst piece of writing I've ever read.

And it only gets worse from there.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

James Cameron’s Avatar series.

Then again… Does anyone actually like it? It seems to have all this online hype when it’s such a boring visual spectacle.

It’s like the opposite of the other Avatar franchise, which wasn’t a commercial hit, and seems less popular on paper, but seems to have a massive cultural impact.

[–] darreninthenet@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ted.

Juvenile fratboy humour done badly, very badly with lots of fan services to get the brainless cheering.

Made me laugh once in the first few minutes (I can't even remember the joke) and walked out of the cinema after about an hour.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You tried to watch this movie sober, didn't you?

That's the problem, lol. You have to turn off a bit of your brain to enjoy yourself properly.

[–] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

That just means the film is stupid.

[–] richieadler@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

You have to turn off a bit of your brain to enjoy yourself properly.

People with this attitude are my enemies. Specially if they propose alcohol as method.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Spirited Away

No consistent world, cringy behaviour of the main character, love story out of nowhere, you can't have a plot twist if you didn't have any previously established lore. It felt a bit like a dream that was trying to take itself seriously as an actual story.

[–] myrmidex@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Inglourious Basterds.

However much I liked all the Tarantino flicks before this one, I just cannot get into Inglourious. Also, everything Tarantino made after that movie is also tainted by the same uneasy feeling I get. If pressed to guess why, I'd say he took the stories out of the 'now' and transported them to other times and places, which just does not seem to agree with me.

[–] squid_slime@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

ET, Ghost Busters, Back to The Future, Anything Marvel, DC apart from Joker. And many more.

[–] AWittyUsername@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ready Player One was so bad, but this is a rare instance where the book is worse than the film. At least the film has visuals the book is just cringe and rememberberries.

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Agreed. That book was recommended to me by a few fellow sci-fi book fans, so I gave it a shot. Couldn’t get through it. It read like a 6th-grade kid’s fanfic about the 1980’s. Bad writing, bad dialogue, ham-fisted plot.

[–] klemptor@startrek.website 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To be honest, isn't it a 'Young Adult' book, i.e., intended for preteens/teens, not adults?

[–] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Saving Private Ryan

I like Spielberg, but compared to others in the war drama genre like Band of Brothers or Full Metal Jacket, SPR is laughably bad.

The tone of the movie, trying to be more inspirational than realistic, was awkward at best. Acting was pretty mediocre, probably because the script and characters were 1 dimensional.

It completely disregards the historical context of the war. You could watch this movie and learn absolutely nothing about the history of WWII.

Now Band of Brothers. That was some amazing retelling of true war stories. It wasn't trying to be inspirational. It was just honest about the chaos and brutality of war. That made it harrowing heartbreaking, infuriating, and inspirational all at once.

[–] aivoton@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago

The beginning of Saving Private Ryan is the only part worth to watch. It's pretty meh afterwards.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Harry Potter.

Before JK went mask off, I had dropped the books about half way though for being increasing annoyed with how they ended. Never any change to the status quo except Harry actually regressing in character development. I watched the first movie, but that was around when I dropped the books and never looked back.

I was able to just quietly keep my opinions to myself, but with with JK becoming increasing unhinged with both her tweets and books, I haven't felt the need to be polite with the "separate the art from the artists" types. Especially when they just assume that you're a fan if you don't correct them.

[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

JK Rowling holds a very common position amongst older feminists and really doesn't deserve the constant rape threats for funding women's refuges. I'm pushing back on the party line here, and no, I don't believe trans people deserve to be killed, or any bullshit like that. I promise to hide them in my non-existent attic if it comes to that.

Edit: the books did get progressively worse after the third or possibly fourth one, though, and the films aren't very good.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

It being common does not make it ok. If she were just quietly anti-trans in her personal life that might be something we could overlook. But she is proudly and actively hateful towards trans people. She ignores the fact that trans women are even more likely than cis women to be victims of gender-based violence and pretends that trans women are actually predators. And she engages in bullshit "transvestigating", drumming up witch hunts against butch cis women. She is actively causing harm against women, including the cis women she claims to want to protect. She’s a terrorist using stochastic methods.

[–] allo@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tolkein.

I tried watching the new tolkein Rohirrim movie. There were clues I would hate it already, but they started with one of those 'tolkein songs' like by elves or whatever ~one of the ones where he's like modeling the dialect on some euro language and being a nerd with glasses in the library holding up a schematic of what he just made and being like, "it's music". So it started with that and I was done. did not get past opening song.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No Tolkien’s languages were created wholecloth by Tolkien. He just used similar phonemic inventories as existing languages, for example Sindarin having a similar inventory to Welsh. But the vocabulary and grammar are entirely their own.

[–] allo@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Everything he made is corrupted with the inappropriate patriarchy of an unwoke time.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Ok? Not sure how that relates to what we were discussing about his languages.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh I have another one. Thor Ragnarok. People loved it because they liked the Thor character and found his earlier films too dull or something, but I loved that they were unapologetically serious about themselves, using comedy in ways that felt very authentic to the characters.

But Ragnarok? It came out later the same year as this excellent essay about bathos, and it was dripping in it. I was hyper tuned to the problem with bathos, and it leaned even harder into that took than nearly any other MCU film did.

What sucks so much is that it had the bones of a really good dramatic story. The Bruce Banner/Hulk storyline had built up over multiple previous films, and come the climax of this film it's established that he's in Bruce form now and has enough control to stay that way, but if he transforms into Hulk it'll be a big deal and he may never be able to be himself again. So they arrive in Asgard at the climax of the film and it's pretty urgent. In a dramatic moment you can see him steel himself to make the sacrifice; he jumps out of their aircraft onto the rainbow bridge, clearly intending to transform into Hulk to fight Fenris.

…and he splats. Faceplants on the bridge. Still in human form. It's played for laughs. The ultimate conclusion of Hulk's story in this movie and probably the most important moment of his arc over the entire MCU to this point, and it's undercut by a joke. Not even a very funny one. A slapstick joke that would make Charlie Chaplin cringe.

And it means nothing, because the very next shit, he's transformed anyway and throwing Fenris around like a doll.

Not to mention it undermines the verisimilitude of the movie. I can suspend my disbelief in these movies pretty hard, but Bruce Banner, in human form, is meant to be painfully average, physically speaking. He should have died from that fall, given he didn't transform. That's certainly not the worst thing about the moment, but it is was the sprinkling of salt on top of the wound that just made it that little bit worse.

That moment was the worst bit, but the film as a whole was full of lazy humour and bathos, and it was really just the worst example of what was wrong with a lot of MCU movies at the time. I was shocked to hear so few people came away disliking it in the same way I did.

[–] Platypus@lemmings.world 1 points 1 year ago

I'm sorry but all the previous Thor movies (and the one after this) are ASS. Ragnarok is the only good Thor movie.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Donnie Darko.

It was so overhyped back when it came out because the OG hipster crowd of the early 90s thought it was cool, as did younger people who valued things that were “indie” as if that inherently adds value.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Fuck your lack of commitment to sparkle motion.

[–] Sixtyforce@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago

Nosferatu, the one that just came out, is very well done. It's also just Nosferatu: Again.

I was very bored watching the movie because it's the same story I've heard before many times. Those 2 hours and 12 minutes dragged hard.