this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
298 points (97.8% liked)

politics

22540 readers
3673 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] whodrankarnoldpalmer@startrek.website 47 points 1 day ago (2 children)

“If they persist” = “as long as everyone keeps rolling over and allowing it”

[–] Hylactor@sopuli.xyz 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Right-o, then: Protesty protest. Whoops, I got bagged by facial recognition and sent to El Salvador by gustapo. At least the media completely ignored the protest and no one even knows it happened.

A guy just got kicked out of Madison Square Garden. He was banned for life for a shirt he sold online that called for the removal of the MSG Ceo. He didn't buy the tickets he was using, and hasn't been to an MSG property in 20 years. They picked him out of the crowd using facial recognition, which was linked to his social media, which was matched to a list of banned people. This is just the actions of a private entity, how deep do you think the governments abilities reach?

Protesting these days is a lot bigger ask than it was even 20 years ago. Proper resistance even harder still. I agree we need action, drastic action, and soon. But I don't fault ordinary people for being afraid to lose everything for what they believe.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

Important distinction: to lose everything for someone else for ever diminishing returns

If I didn’t have to support anyone I’d already be organizing marches

[–] triped@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

True. But we have other leverage. Some 70% of the economy is consumer spending. Stop buying things and the complicit corporations that are dependent on quarterly growth will change their tune quickly. Even if they don't get to have another tax cut.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Have you seen the mass protests protesting the mass protestors getting imprisoned for protesting?

[–] whodrankarnoldpalmer@startrek.website 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Sounds like it’s time to try something that isn’t as easily ignored.

This is the part where Americans shirk responsibility by telling me “you first” and then telling me “then keep your mouth shut” when they hear I’m not from the states- which is 1) hilarious coming from Americans and 2) helps them to go on pretending someone else will come to save them.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Protests are important. But our biggest tool is the general strike.

[–] whodrankarnoldpalmer@startrek.website 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

If you insist on non-violence, why are we not seeing more cyberwarfare? Ransomware. MITM attacks. Social engineering. Catfishing. Expose the thousands of pedophiles in the GOP- politicians AND voters. Disrupt or intercept communication. Hit them financially. Protests are easily ignored. Cyberattacks aren’t.

Out-tech these guys. Outsmart them. Even the clever, crafty alt-right assholes at the end of the day aren’t PARTICULARLY bright. The “left” in the US, such as it is, is very much not living up to its self-proclaimed intelligence relative to the right.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Expose the thousands of pedophiles in the GOP

I mean, this exists:

https://www.dailykos.com/history/user/CajsaLilliehook

And those are just the officials who have been caught by law enforcement.

I say, open season on the voters themselves as well- by everyone. Out them to their families, employers, religious groups- go wild.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lol wut. That happens all the time. But DoS doesn't take down fascists and the courts apparently dont care if you're a rapist if you're a billionaire.

[–] whodrankarnoldpalmer@startrek.website 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I’m talking mostly about the voters, not the party leaders.

But hey, if you don’t like the non-violent option, there’s always the other one.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago

May 1 2028 mark your calenders

[–] Xanza@lemm.ee 27 points 1 day ago

Well, that's the plan.

[–] comrade_twisty@feddit.org 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As a European who studied in the US and since moved back to Europe after working in Silicon Valley for a while I am actually more and more ashamed about the US section of my CV.

I don’t even mention my time in the US in my cover letters anymore when applying for jobs.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

well, Silicon Valley used to be good 5+ years ago. The enshittification cycle only started somewhere around 2018 imho.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

It certainly kicked into overdrive around then.

[–] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago

"I love the poorly educated" -Trump, 2016

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

When HitlerPig's wars start, he's going to need a draft to fill the ranks, and in the past, college students were deferred. By destroying the age and role of colleges in pur society, he can lay the groundwork of not allowing them to be an excuse to avoid mandatory military service.

There will still be ways to opt out, but they will all be extremely expensive, and require other qualifications such as proof of ideology, clean social media record, a loyalty oath, etc. But mostly money. Pay enough, you can avoid the draft. They might even resurrect the Civil War era custom of hiring someone to take your place. The bottom line is that the wealthy won't have to go, if they are willing to pay enough to save their children's lives.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

America would burn if he tried to draft people to invade Canada

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The only reason to join the military to invade Canada, is to defect once you get there.

That could be a great strategy for "The Enemy." Just make it known to the American military draftees that if they defect, they will be richly rewarded with amnesty and assistance in settling in their new country. If my son was drafted, and was heading off to war, I would encourage him to defect the first chance he got. He wouldn't be alone, thousands would do the same thing, crippling any strategies the military was attempting.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Bone spurs. Everyone should start claiming bone spurs. Incurable.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The US draft system hasn't had college deferments since the latter part of the Vietnam war.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We haven't had a draft since the latter part of the Vietnam War. They both ended at the exact time. What's your point?

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I had the impression that college deferment ended about a year before the draft did.

I don't expect college draft deferment to be a thing again until the boomers die.

[–] CherryBullets@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago

Never thought stupid comedy relief movies about college life were going to be historical records of how US society used to be before becoming a hellhole that doesn't value higher education.

[–] BlackSheep@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

“The End of College Life…” I think that’s the whole point.

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Claim bone spurs, then conscientious objector and if all fails, there's fragging.