this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
131 points (82.3% liked)

Technology

70461 readers
2507 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 91 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Mass-Produced

I want to see these masses who can pay the million :)

[–] tonyn@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

A million doesn't get you what it used to, and you'd be shocked at how many quiet millionaires there are out there.

[–] will_a113@lemm.ee 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There might be a lot more millionaires than before, but it’d still be a much smaller number who could drop $1M on a flying car.

[–] tonyn@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It's cheaper than a private jet and there are LOADS of them buzzing around polluting the skies.

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Way more expensive than most private aircraft, though.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TheLemming@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

That may be true, but private jets are significantly more practical than this. If you've got private jet money, you can just afford to buy a jet and a decent car at your destination.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bluGill@fedia.io 5 points 1 week ago

an assembly line that can make 2 per year still qualifies as mass production. At the level of people who can afford a million you can't sell more than a couple per year anyway. There are a few car companies that have production numbers in that range.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works 43 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s not a flying car. It’s an airplane.

[–] WanderingThoughts 14 points 1 week ago

It's by definition trying to merge two opposite specs into one vehicle using the worst aspects of the two.

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Give me a intercity train or intercity tram any day.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 5too@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (2 children)

“The AirCar fulfills a lifelong dream to bring the freedom of flight into the hands of everyday people.”

The price? Between $800,000 and $1 million, depending on specs.

[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Don't forget the cost and time investment in getting your pilots licence.

Also there is no way this is going to be legal to drive on public roads in most countries - just look at the massive tail boom that sticks out. This is just a fancy aircraft for people that want an overcomplicated Cessna.

[–] CandleTiger@programming.dev 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The tail boom is massive compared to a sports car but I think the folded-up package looks not bigger than a giant American SUV.

Speaking as one who routinely has trouble parking a motor home and driving over curbs with it — this big awkward-looking vehicle doesn’t look like a great city-car but it does not compete with motor homes for the awkwardness prize.

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

I couldn’t find specs skimming through the article, but it doesn’t look like it would fit in any normal parking space. Driving around might be as unwieldy as a motorhome or box truck, without the height advantage when you inevitably drive over a curb while turning. Doing that might also make it un-airworthy.

[–] HiTekRedNek@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What's crazy is you can build a kit plane for less than what this costs, and flying a kit plane does NOT need a pilot license in the US.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HakunaHafada@lemm.ee 32 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I feel like "mass-produced" is doing a lot of heavy lifting here. Also, insurance is going to be insane.

[–] whereisk@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Also “car” - can my local mechanic service it and give it a flying certificate? If not, it’s not a car.

More like a barely road-worthy airplane.

[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You don't get insurance on these

[–] HakunaHafada@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're right; I forget insurance is for the poor.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Libra@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yeah, I too once thought flying cars were the best idea since sliced bread. I've since grown up and realized that they're just airplanes with extra steps, cause it's not like you're ever going to be able to land it on a highway or whatever. It will always be cheaper to just buy an airplane and a car and use one to get to the other.

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I guess the problem is that if you take your car to the plane, then your plane somewhere else, suddenly you don't have your car. And then if you drive somewhere else you don't have your plane any more.

I think it's pretty obvious that rental cars and commercial flights make a lot more sense for most scenarios. But I guess it's possible to imagine scenarios where this vehicle makes sense, either for extensive round trips or for places where car rentals don't exist but the roads are nevertheless pretty good.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The vehicle, certified for airworthiness and flight-tested over 170 hours with more than 500 takeoffs and landings, is now headed for mass production.

Jesus fuck please tell me that's a typo and they left some zeros off. Your average commercial pilot has more than that before any airline is even willing to consider hiring them, that is absolutely not sufficient testing.

Still, early adopters may face bureaucratic turbulence. Potential buyers must be both licensed drivers and certified pilots.

No shit. And that is never going to change, becoming a certified pilot is a lot fuckin harder than getting a driver's license, and for very good reasons. If some BMW-driving cunt can't even be arsed to use his turn signal do you really want to ease the "bureaucratic turbulence" just so he can fuck up and crash into a packed airliner? These things still have to use runways, the people flying them still need to know how to behave themselves at airports, how to identify and avoid restricted airspace, how to communicate with ATC and how to behave if (let's be honest, when) they get Intercepted.

And all of this so you can have a car that's worse at being a car, and an airplane that's worse at being an airplane, but hey at least you won't have to book a rental car at your destination airport, which I remind you they still have to use.

[–] ChillPenguin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As long as they're only using smaller airports. Let the millionaires and billionaires have this. It's like another ocean gate scenario.

I agree with everything you're saying though haha.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

The ocean depths arent above innocent people's heads.

[–] Ibuthyr@lemmy.wtf 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I still don't get how these companies keep getting funded. There's literally no way these things will ever become a thing. It's simply ridiculous.

[–] GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

I'd be willing to bet if you put a calendar reminder in one year to check back on this you'd find that this car did not actually reach the mass-produced stage of industry.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

a plane. A flying car is called a plane.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

I bet it handles like a boat on the roads though.

[–] nao@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

A plane that looks a bit like a car.

Or you could buy a Skyhawk, three Toyota Camrys and fuel for a year.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 18 points 1 week ago

So it's a small plane then?

I swear I saw this on TV like 20 years ago, it's a stupid idea, if I wanted a plane I would buy a plane and then drive to the airport in my car, attempting to combine the two technologies just makes both of them worse.

[–] Montreal_Metro@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 week ago

It’s called a plane.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't trust must drivers on roads, much less the air. No good will come of this.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I am driving through a slight detour on my commute, it's still 3 lanes but with a slight bend, motherfuckers can't even keep their car in their fucking lane, almost hit 3 people this morning, fuckers can't drive

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Glifted@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

There are street legal autogyros that are a lot cheaper and make more sense as a crossover vehicle

https://youtu.be/8VKfqzmLohM

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 12 points 1 week ago

I hope its a popular buy among all our billionaires.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Damn, we really got flying cars before

  1. GTA 6
  2. Elder Scrolls 6
  3. Half Life 3 (but barely? Hopefully?)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sugar_Spark@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago

Sweet. We need more ways for the 1% to kill themselves.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Okay I will admit it was impressive to see how they solved where to stow the wings and essentially shrink the airplane footprint to a long car footprint, but who is this for? Who out there has $1mil to blow and is like, "I have to drive directly from the tarmac to my hotel"?

This thing needs 300m of runway in its airplane form to get airborne, so forget city or even suburban takeoffs. And you're not going to just drive this thing around. At the end of the day, this is still a (very fancy) plane that drives.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cy_narrator@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 week ago

We have had helicoptors for all these decades

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 7 points 1 week ago

Oh just like they did 5yrs ago every 5 years since the invention of powered flight

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

That's not very expensiv...

[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Seen this like 10 years ago lol

[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Looks a bit like in "The Man With The Golden Gun"

[–] ABetterTomorrow@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

If wings don’t fold, fold your brain.

[–] Melonpoly@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What problem does this solve? And is that problem worth all the negatives this brings?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

That's not the "flying car" anyone envisioned or wanted. That's just an airplane but a lot shittier.

load more comments
view more: next ›