this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2026
759 points (99.1% liked)

Fuck AI

5188 readers
1647 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

This is why I can’t buy dram

[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 141 points 3 days ago (5 children)

AI has achieved the intelligence of the average voter

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm convinced this is why people are so seemingly impressed with AI. It's smarter than the average person because the average person is that ignorant. To these people these things are ungodly smart and because of the puffery they don't feel talked down to which increases their perception of it's intelligence; it tells them how smart and clever they are in a way no sentient entity would ever do.

[–] cecilkorik@piefed.ca 2 points 2 days ago

Yes. Remember that these things have been largely designed and funded by companies who make their money from advertising and marketing. The purpose of advertising and marketing is to convince people of something, whether that thing is actually true or not. They are experts at it, and now they have created software designed to convince people of things, whether it is actually true or not. Then they took all the combined might of their marketing and advertising expertise and infrastructure, including the AI software itself, and set it to the task of convincing people that AI is good and is going to change the world.

And everyone was convinced. Whether it is actually true or not.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 20 points 3 days ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Mvlad88@lemmy.world 56 points 3 days ago (4 children)
[–] thesdev@feddit.org 54 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So when one uses AI on Ecosia, are they helping to plant a tree or burn one? Perhaps it's a toss-up.

[–] X@piefed.world 20 points 3 days ago

Task unsuccessfully failed successfully.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Something, something "leap years". Well that explains it.

[–] jaredwhite@humansare.social 9 points 3 days ago

That answer was wrong. So therefore, that answer was correct. No. Yes. Maybe.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 47 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (10 children)

It's pretty obvious how this happened.

All the data it has been trained on said "next year is 2026" and "2027 is two years from now" and now that it is 2026 it doesn't actually change the training data. It doesn't know what year it is, it only knows how to regurgitate answers it was already trained on.

[–] crmsnbleyd@sopuli.xyz 13 points 3 days ago (2 children)

nah, training data is not why it answered this (otherwise it would have training data from many different years, way more than of 2025)

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

There's data weights for recency, so after a certain point "next year is 2026" will stop being weighted over "next year is 2027"

It's early in the year, so that threshold wasn't crossed yet.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

I couldn't keep up to that. It really teared my attention apart.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Obviously its 2012 again!

2013 never happened. We just keep repeating 2012 over and over to see if we can make the world end this time around.

[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Side note: that's not a Mayan calendar.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Es tenochtitlstlepekalpanamixtlatxiuatl. Te vas derecho diez cuadras y luego a la derecha junto a la ferreteria Damian Gonzales y Pavon de la Huerta Porfirio Ybarra. Preguntas por Inez, es la que esta requetetlalpan. Ya nomas tras lomita de hay se ve que de hay era pues.

Lo que no me cae son los taparrabos.

[–] Janx@piefed.social 17 points 3 days ago

Yeah, this "sequence guesser" is definitely something we should have do all the coding, and control the entire Internet.. 

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 23 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] YoSoySnekBoi@kbin.earth 18 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It’s amazing how it works with like every LLM

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I'm guessing they're still stuck on thinking it's 2025 somehow, which is pretty crazy since keeping accurate track of dates and numbers SHOULD be the most basic thing an AI can do.

[–] naught@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

AI doesn't "know" anything. It's a big statistical probability model that predicts words based on context. It is very specifically BAD at math and dates etc. because it works based on words, not numbers. Models can't do math

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago

Yeah, I'm being colloquial with saying "thinking," and that makes sense! Computers that are bad at math, what genius!

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Actually, it's what traditional software should be very good at, LLM is actually inherently kind of bad at it. Much work has gone into getting the LLMs to detect mathy stuff and try to shuffle off to some other technology that can cope with it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Copilot was interesting: Is it 2027 next year? Not quite! Next year will be 2026 + 1 = 2027, but since we’re currently in 2026, the next year is 2027 only after this year ends. So yes—2027 is next year, starting on January 1, 2027.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, "AI" is just statistical analysis. There's more data in it's database that indicates the 2027 is not year and only a few days worth of data that indicates that it is. Since there's more data indicating 2027 is not next year, it chooses that as the correct answer.

LLMs are a useful tool if you know what it is, it's strengths and weaknesses. But it's not intelligent and doesn't understand how things work. But if you have some fuzzy data you want analyzed and validate the results, it can save some time to get to a starting point. It's kinda like wikipedia in a way, you get to a starting point faster, but have to take things with a grain of salt and put some effort make sure things are accurate.

[–] pez@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 days ago

Google pulled the AI overview from the search, but "is it 2027 next year ai overview" was a suggested search because this screenshot is making the rounds. The AI overview now has all the discussion of this error in it's data set and mentions it in it's reply but still fails.

[–] criticon@lemmy.ca 18 points 3 days ago

I recently found this (it can be replicated with many values):

[–] Ethalis@jlai.lu 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I love how overexplained this wrong answer is

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Talking to AI is like talking to an 8-year-old. Has just enough information to be confidently wrong about everything.

[–] bbboi@feddit.uk 0 points 1 day ago

An eight year old that takes everything literally.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

This is worth at least 500 trillion dollars!

We have a virtual parrot, it's not "intelligence" in any way. So many suckers

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 3 points 2 days ago

This isn't just the machine being ignorant or wrong.

This is a level of artificial stupidity that is downright eldritch and incomprehensible

[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Can we be done with this whole years thing?

It's very evidently not working out.

Every one of them is orders of magnitude worse than the one before.

Lets just not have a new year, just stop here, and try to go back if possible?

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I'm still not entirely convinced that we've left 2016.

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

TBF how things are going we will give up the Gregorian calendar this year in favor of a random number generator.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago
[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 days ago

Next year (2028) will be when it finally takes over everything

[–] Shanmugha@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Definitely killer of all jobs. Sad part is that I'm guessing it will take many lives before the hysteria is over

[–] kadu@scribe.disroot.org 7 points 3 days ago

(this is when your question is relevant)

PhD level, I tell ya.

[–] Kowowow@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago

I could totally relate id the AI claimed it was still like 2020 or something

"Huh, me too buddy"

load more comments
view more: next ›