this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
63 points (95.7% liked)

Ask Lemmy

30593 readers
1372 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What does someone have to do that means no amount of remorse or effort to fix things will get you to forgive them? I don't mean forgive and forget to the point where they can hurt you again. If someone repeatedly steals from you, forgiveness doesn't mean putting them in a position where they can steal again.

I'm asking this purely out of curiosity. I'm just wondering what the attitude in my corner of the internet is.

all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Spaniard@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That time my cousin and aunt made a scene the first night in the funeral home after my mom died. That's irreparable because

  1. My mom died that fucking day, 2 years after my dad and they were supposed to all be close.
  2. It was due to my personal life (my soon-to-be-wife). To add some context: she is a foreigner so there is a lot of racism and a bit of classism.
  3. Her only living sister.
  4. It's been 6 months and they haven't contacted me, apologized or anything,

Don't get me wrong. They are forgiven, but it hurts and it will hurt for the rest of my life so I don't be able to ever open the door for them to come back into my life.

[–] TheFunkyMonk@lemmy.world 51 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

For me, it’s really just a lack of actual remorse or effort to fix things. As long as they’re willing to demonstrate they recognize what they did and will work to be better (and it’s not a recurring pattern), we’re cool.

[–] steeznson@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think generally the same but there are extreme cases like murder where a person can atone all they want but shouldn't necessarily be granted forgiveness.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

To me it kinda have to depend on what kind of murder. Accidentally killed someone in self defence or as a victim of abuse? Yeah it can be forgiven. Going out of their way to kill someone or doing something that's dangerous that result in killing someone? That's unforgivable.

[–] vinnymac@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I hereby declare all of those unpremeditated types of murder should henceforth be referred to as “oopsies”.

Murder makes it sound so intentional in my mind.

[–] Smokeydope@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The legal term for a lethal 'oopsie' is manslaughter I'm pretty sure.

Ive always found it a little strange that the law and insurance companies and human society in general is hyperfocused with finding a scapegoat to blame and persecute. People die sometimes just because of shit happening outside of anyone's control but we've gotta dig for someone to pin blame on. Someones parachute didn't work right that day? Its the parachute makers or the safety inspectors or the airplane owners who are to blame and not random unavoidable small chance of statistical failure rates. Gotta sue sue sue!

[–] GoodLuckToFriends@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I always recommend reading the whole thing, because the work is incredible, but as to the 'oopsie' of manslaughter, it's nice to read some of the theory behind it: https://lawcomic.net/guide/?p=185 (edit, oh god, the april fools thing is horrible. I'm sorry in advance)

As for the parachute thing, most of the time the cause of the accident is the skydiver. https://www.uspa.org/searchincidentreports It also makes a lot of sense to look closely at the manufacturers/inspectors/dropzone operators, because otherwise a lot of shit could get swept under the rug as just random occurrences. As in engineering, we must examine where we can fix what went wrong. I can understand the frustration that the process often is entangled with the courtroom, but if a jury, presented with evidence and arguments by both sides, comes to the conclusion that one party was injured due to another's actions and restitution is deserved, who the fuck are we to gainsay that? I'm aware of many times where the "random unavoidable small chance of statistical failure rates" is settled on as the cause and there isn't a settlement paid. Even talking about removing someone's ability to seek remedy from the courts is an action that should be looked at with no small amount of suspicion.

[–] stinerman@midwest.social 8 points 2 days ago

If people are truly sorry and have taken steps to make sure that what they did will never happen again, they are eligible for forgiveness of anything.

The only time something would become unforgivable is if it were done with intentional malice or becomes a pattern of behavior. I'm willing to forgive quiet a bit, if the harm an action caused was not the intent. When it becomes the intent, such as physical violence or repeated trauma, that's where I take a hard line and will not forgive. For less spectacular transgressions, repeat events are where things become unforgivable. I am willing to give grace on that more because I'm bad about not communicating to others how their actions hurt me, but if we've talked about how their behavior is a problem and they keep doing it? No sorry, we're done.

[–] MintyFresh@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Granting forgiveness isn't about them, it's about you letting go of the hurt. It doesn't mean things necessarily just go back to the way they were, it means things can move onto the next thing. It's about taking that weight off your soul.

I see a lot of people letting their trauma define them. Let the shit drop and grow flowers. Easier said than done, but I think it's still easier than not doing it.

[–] Hudell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

When they do the exact same thing after you already forgave them before.

Also when they were given plenty of warning before doing whatever they did.

So, for both cases, it's when they show that they are OK with breaking your trust because they expect to be forgiven afterwards.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's not about "forgiveness", it's about whether the mistakes can be undone.

Consider you accidentally insult somebody. That can be undone by apologizing.

What if you murder somebody? That can never be undone.

An apology doesn't undo what you said any more than it brings someone back to life.

[–] Lemming421@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

People do occasionally forgive murderers.

Not the victims, admittedly, but their families sometimes.

[–] Today@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

Probably dishonesty. Coworker threw away thousands of dollars worth of my department's equipment and then lied to me about it. I know she was just repeating her boss, but she knew it was a lie. I'll hold a grudge against both of those removed forever!

Two former friends hit on my husband - not just flirty, pretty seriously with an expectation of more. They're both out forever!

[–] venotic@kbin.melroy.org 4 points 2 days ago

I've forgiven way too much to people than I should ever have in the first place and I allowed them to get away with too much than they ever should.

To me, someone or something becomes unforgivable, when you've presented them perfect opportunities or chances to make up for their fuck up. Continual and repetitious fuck ups, really sets in stone how not-so-apologetic someone is that has made the mistakes. Because in come the excuses, in come the sob stories, in come the laundry list of reasons .etc

It becomes too much, especially if someone fucks something up for you or someone else in a colossal way. These days, if you want to be sorry for something, you don't fucking do it again. That's all and it depends on what it is.

[–] 2ugly2live@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Things that betray trust are very hard for me to let go. Theft, backstabbing, lies, etc. If I can't trust you, I can't hang out with you.

[–] temporal_spider@lemm.ee 8 points 2 days ago

I'm really glad you at least partially qualified what you mean by forgiveness. Or at least what you do not mean by it. The type of forgiveness I think you're trying to suggest is more of an internal process. It's not really about the other person at all. For example, there are some family members of murder victims who say they have forgiven the killer. They are not saying the killer deserves to go free. They're just saying they don't want to carry that hatred through the rest of their lives. By that definition, I don't think any of us know what we might be able to let go of.

[–] Thatuserguy@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If they go out of their way to hurt you, or are so indifferent about you that they hurt you in the process of doing something else and decide they don't care.

People who value you and your feelings so little that they would do either are not worth keeping around, and certainly aren't worth your effort emotionally to be able to forgive

[–] Kingofthezyx@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

Totally agree on this - I have forgiven a lot of shit in my life but the one thing that has truly hurt me is when someone I cared about was offended by my methods of expressing concern to them about their behavior, and they retaliated by trying to get my partner to leave me.

Despite the fact that it was a laughable attempt, the intention to actually hurt me, not just accidental toe-stepping or expression of frustration, is what drew a line for me.

I will forgive unintentional damage followed by remorse, I will forgive outbursts and emotional interaction, but actively trying to hurt someone is the behavior of an adversary.

[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

When the same attempts to set healthy boundaries with that person are ignored repeatedly. Sure, give them a chance to try and adjust their behavior if the relationship is otherwise valuable.

But after you are sure that you have been consistent and clear for a reasonable amount of time and the boundaries still get invaded?

Bye, Felicia.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The second time they do it. You get one chance to do some mild shit and I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. Of course, I don't announce it but I keep tabs.

[–] nova_dragon@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

When criticism of the act gets enough likes on Lemmy and/or Reddit—that's when I know what to think.

[–] Opinionhaver@feddit.uk 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I can forgive mistakes and bad judgment, but if you intentionally do something that makes me lose trust and respect, it’s going to be hard to earn that back. If you lie to me, for example, I don’t see it as a one-time action - it reveals something about the kind of person you are. Saying you won’t do it again doesn’t mean much after you've already shown it’s something you’ve been doing up to this point.

I don’t believe in free will, so when I see someone act this way, I don’t even really blame them. I don’t see it as a conscious decision, but more as a behavior they’re helplessly repeating. And people rarely change that kind of behavior unless the motivation comes from within - not from outside pressure.

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don’t believe in free will, so when I see someone act this way, I don’t even really blame them. I don’t see it as a conscious decision, but more as a behavior they’re helplessly repeating. And people rarely change that kind of behavior unless the motivation comes from within - not from outside pressure.

That’s an interesting angle. But without free will, wouldn’t it be that they could never change the behavior unless it was already preordained?

[–] Opinionhaver@feddit.uk 1 points 2 days ago

I don't believe people can choose to change their behavior in the way we usually think. But I do believe they can be influenced to change - by new information or experiences.

Take this example: if we suddenly discovered that tomatoes are toxic, I wouldn’t say I’m actively choosing to stop eating them. What’s really happening is that my understanding of the world has changed so much that I automatically no longer want to eat them. It’s not about freedom of choice - it’s more like being compelled by truth. I didn’t decide to change; the change happened to me because of what I learned.

[–] coaxil@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hmmmm probably a lot of things, but first to mind is animal cruelty

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 1 points 2 days ago

What counts as animal cruelty?

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Nothing.

I could cut ties with a person over the most trivial of things, but as a consequentialist I would be betraying logic by labelling somebody as unforgiveable.

That is not to say that I would ever let a person go without consequences, far from it.

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Forgiveness is always possible, although if someone hits me with DARVO, I'm going to forever filter their behavior through a check before helping them. It's sorta amazing what we can go through and forgive after, but I guess the misnomer is that the apology is for them and not ourselves.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Intentionally did something dangerous that you know will get people hurt with a slightest mistake. Like driving recklessly, or pushing others in a huge crowd. There's no amount of sorry will make me believe you're remorseful, you're only sorry because stuff that will happen happened.

Ohh and embezzlement of public fund. Fuck off with that crocodile tear.

[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I am not sure - this is a great question though - at what point do you let it keep harming you instead of letting it go? All the complicated social systems of revenge and avenging and reparation built around this.

[–] pleasestopasking@reddthat.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You can forgive while also opting out of the situation, though. Forgiveness doesn't always mean a continued relationship.

[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I don't mean letting them keep harming you - I mean when do you think it's worth keeping the hate inside you, the unforgiveness. It doesn't do anything to harm the offender, it's only harmful to the victim.

So when is it worth holding on to that at your own expense? It's a good question.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Anything done in person with absolute disrespect and malice

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk -3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Never.

Matthew 18:21-35

Then Peter came up and said to him, “Lord, how often will my brother sin against me, and I forgive him? As many as seven times?” Jesus said to him, “I do not say to you seven times, but seventy-seven times. “Therefore the kingdom of heaven may be compared to a king who wished to settle accounts with his servants. When he began to settle, one was brought to him who owed him ten thousand talents. And since he could not pay, his master ordered him to be sold, with his wife and children and all that he had, and payment to be made. So the servant fell on his knees, imploring him, ‘Have patience with me, and I will pay you everything.’ And out of pity for him, the master of that servant released him and forgave him the debt. But when that same servant went out, he found one of his fellow servants who owed him a hundred denarii, and seizing him, he began to choke him, saying, ‘Pay what you owe.’ So his fellow servant fell down and pleaded with him, ‘Have patience with me, and I will pay you.’ He refused and went and put him in prison until he should pay the debt. When his fellow servants saw what had taken place, they were greatly distressed, and they went and reported to their master all that had taken place. Then his master summoned him and said to him, ‘You wicked servant! I forgave you all that debt because you pleaded with me. And should not you have had mercy on your fellow servant, as I had mercy on you?’ And in anger his master delivered him to the jailers,until he should pay all his debt. So also my heavenly Father will do to every one of you, if you do not forgive your brother from your heart.”

[–] GoodLuckToFriends@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So that means everyone goes to heaven, right?

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 0 points 1 day ago

Nope. The servant begged for mercy.

So the servant fell on his knees, imploring him, ‘Have patience with me, and I will pay you everything.’ And out of pity for him, the master of that servant released him and forgave him the debt.

The parable also comes with a stark warning:

So also my heavenly Father will do to every one of you, if you do not forgive your brother from your heart.”