this post was submitted on 25 May 2025
103 points (97.2% liked)

Hardware

2166 readers
142 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] madame_gaymes@programming.dev 75 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (4 children)

Something something Half Life 3

But also, fuck no. I would never trust modern software or hardware companies to develop something that is going to be connected to my brain. We can't even trust social media or AI companies not to fuck us up without the physical connection.

[–] Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world 25 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Might change your tune if you're paraplegic

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago

That's completely fair.

[–] madame_gaymes@programming.dev 6 points 5 days ago

I get where you're coming from, but being paraplegic doesn't make Musk and Newell any less driven by money. Maybe Newell will surprise me and make it open source, which would help me see it as an actual philanthropic venture.

If society was headed towards Star Trek I'd be less apprehensive, but as it is we're in for an even more bleak version of 1984 somehow.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Tell that to the blind people with cybernetic eye implants that have been discontinued and are now broken. Or people with implanted insulin pumps from now defunct companies.

These are problems that are already occurring with less serious implanted medical technology.

[–] madame_gaymes@programming.dev 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Bingo. Being handicapped in any way doesn't make you less vulnerable to exploitation or decisions driven by shareholders and money. In a lot of cases, it actually increases the chances from my perspective.

[–] simple@piefed.social 4 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Definitely. People need to understand this tech isn't for the average person, but there are still a lot of people that would definitely benefit from it. If you told someone scientists are researching drilling machines to your bone you'd get similar WTF responses, but that's how modern limb replacement works.

[–] Mustakrakish@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

It just should be owned by the people, and not multi-billionaire companies who usenit to extort profit from sick and people with disabilities

[–] madame_gaymes@programming.dev 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

I don't see limb replacements this way at all, but typically limb replacements also do not rely on 3rd party services that might disappear at any time and are almost purely mechanical.

My brother lost his left arm, and what he is getting is controlled entirely by the nub with no outside influence or implanted microchips.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 days ago

This is part of what frustrates me so much about these brain chips. They feel far too much like a solution in search of a problem when we have so many other non-invasive options for interface between the body and "cybernetics", even if we're looking for things "at the speed of thought".

[–] Zexks@lemmy.world -1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Not anywhere near to the level he would have with direct nerve interaction. Just because you all don't understand this or the need doesn't mean others are as ignorant. Or willing to settle for lessor functionality.

[–] madame_gaymes@programming.dev 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I never said something like direct nerve interaction is terrible or nonexistent. My brother also does not like the idea of having something implanted, and would much rather have a mechanical device that he has a chance to repair himself should anything break. That's not being ignorant to anything, just pragmatic.

What I did say is not to trust a money-making business to do it right and not leave you high and dry if they go belly-up.

ETA: also, under the USA healthcare system, something like you suggest is unaffordable for a good chunk of people and the VA only approved the mechanical device any way.

[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago

You essentially said it's pointless or unneeded because your relative can get along fine without it. That's bias and completely ignores others not like your anecdote. No one was talking about cost only functionality. You gonna move the goal posts again.

[–] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago

Why? Then I'd just be a technologically dependent parapalegic who's brain is now subject to malware and EULA changes.

No thanks

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 16 points 6 days ago (3 children)

But think of the ads they could play right into your brain!!

[–] madame_gaymes@programming.dev 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Now with 50% less barbarism!

a clockwork orange

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You mean... With more convenience!

[–] madame_gaymes@programming.dev 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Shit, you're right. I was just using what engineering gave me, but yours tested much better with the focus groups. Let me know if you ever want to transfer from QA to Marketing, you got a real future here 👈😉👈

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago

Sales pitch 101. There's only positives.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 3 points 6 days ago

Good news! They can already do this!

The only existing direct interfaces I know of are cochlear implants. You’d have to pair them with something that can play an ad, like a phone with Spotify, but they can deliver it directly through the auditory nerve to the cochlear nucleus of the brain stem.

What a time to be alive!

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

It is completely out of the question to trust any modern technology company with something like a brain interface.

[–] Maestro@fedia.io 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] kautau@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Yup, other episodes tie into this as well

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Christmas_(Black_Mirror)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men_Against_Fire

And my personal favorite episode, which probably is more fitting for the Gabe Newell side of things

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Playtest_(Black_Mirror)

[–] VeryVito@lemmy.ml 26 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Yes, but honestly the ad-free Real Life+ plan is totally worth the extra $49.95/month just to avoid the ads from interrupting when you’re driving, performing root canals or operating a bandsaw.

[–] madame_gaymes@programming.dev 11 points 6 days ago

One of the new Black Mirror episodes is exactly this. I think episode 1, with Rashida Jones & Chris O'Dowd

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 4 points 6 days ago

No, it's totally free. No ads. It just uses your data to serve ads elsewhere.

Oh, we told you 2 years ago, it would stay that way and you've had irreversible brain surgery now. Well, the servers cost a lot to keep running and so, it was inevitable really. We can't continue to provide the service without charging something. Oh, and there's ads now.

Oh, you've been happily paying. Well, now we have analysed your data and determined you can afford to pay more. Totally a choice. You can cancel anytime. But once the chop is switched off, some people experience a deterioration in executive functioning. And now that it's common, you can't travel or drive without an activated chip. And of course Tesla still hasn't got self driving cars, despite calling their latest package 'its totally self driving now pinky promise'.

[–] dumbass@leminal.space 18 points 6 days ago

He's just doing this so he can run doom.

[–] Kowowow@lemmy.ca 12 points 6 days ago

I guess it's nice to have competing companies doing this stuff even if it's not for me

[–] atlien51@lemm.ee 9 points 6 days ago
[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I can understand the medical advances this opens, but I hope there can be non implant options for more "casual" options. I've found Gabe's brain interface research fascinating for years- and it feels so sci-fi we're talking about real applications now.

[–] iglou@programming.dev 1 points 6 days ago

It's highly likely it will be restricted to implants only for quite some time, judging by how difficult it already is that way!

[–] gothiccwaifu@lemm.ee 3 points 6 days ago

There’s a Black Mirror episode about this…

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

All your going to end up with is a subscription on your own brain and possibly ads