h/t to Ed Zitron: https://bsky.app/profile/edzitron.com/post/3mfxqjqoias2q

alt textWSJ PATRICK SISON/ASSOCIATED PRESS Within hours of declaring that the federal government will end its use of artificial-intelligence tools made by tech company Anthropic, President Trump launched a major air attack in Iran with the help of those very same tools. Commands around the world, including U.S. Central Command in the Middle East, use Anthropic's Claude AI tool, people familiar with the matter confirmed. Centcom declined to comment about specific systems being used in its ongoing operation against Iran. The command uses the tool for intelligence assessments, target identification and simulating battle scenarios even as tension between the company and Pentagon ratcheted up, the people said, highlighting how embedded the AI tools are in military operations. The administration and Anthropic have been feuding for months over how its AI models can be used by the Pentagon. Trump on Friday ordered agencies to stop working with the company and the Defense Department designated it a security threat and risk to its supply chain.

all 22 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 85 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (14 children)

This really is the dumbest timeline.

simulating battle scenarios

Regurgitating reddit armchair generals from /r/noncredibledefense

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 6 months ago (9 children)

    Maybe it has a bunch of leaked files from the WarThunder forums as well!

    Simulating battle scenarios is absolutely hilarious, adults standing around the magic 8 ball

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (8 children)

    Simulated battle scenarios are a common component of wargaming. That doesn't mean an LLM is the right tool for it, but it's been a thing for a long time.

    The bigger concern here is using it for intelligence assessments and target acquisition, because LLMs hallucinate a lot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    as a side effect, it's a phenomenal accountability sink. people almost forget that usaf can make entirely human-made fuckups https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amiriyah_shelter_bombing

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah, now when your autonomous weapon systems target your own fighter jets, no one gets court martialled!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    @wonderingwanderer @fullsquare TBF, fighter jets should have been unmanned drones

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    TBF, fighter jets should have been unmanned drones

    On the one hand, an autonomous fighter jet would be immune to G-LOC, letting them perform maneuvers that would incapacitate/kill a human pilot. On the other hand, air-to-air combat is a complex affair, and the enemy will be probing for any weaknesses in your drones' programming to exploit.

    Autonomous bombers seem easier to pull off - bombing missions are (relatively) straightforward compared to air-to-air combat.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    That's fair, I only meant it to poke fun at the LLM simulating battle scenarios, I know it's useful in general to simulate and wargame

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 25 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    If they were talking about some complex simulation engine utilizing ML and research carefully collated and constructed, this would be at least interesting.

    But they aren't. We shoved the entirety of text produced by the human race in a big pot, mixed it up, and extrude it by most likely connections. It is predictive of words and phrases, not of human behavior, physics of munitions, or anything actually useful for modeling warfare.

    They're fucking generating war fanfic and using it to make stratgic decisions. Just hire Clancy, Crichton, Card, and/or whoever's ghost writing for them now. It'd be cheaper.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 6 months ago

    Yeah, the fact that the nation's highest military command no longer understands the difference between machine learning and an LLM is gravely concerning...

    They fired all the professionals in 2025. All that's left are the sycophants.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 30 points 6 months ago* (3 children)

    Incredibly ballsy move to keep using their tech after you literally branded them a supply chain threat and implied you would take legal action against them, but that’s this administration for ya

    (they did say there would be a six-month phase out period after which if Anthropic still didn’t comply, they’d force them to, but still)

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    They want anthropic to drop the guardrails because they're literally using Claude for their strategic planning...

    The US went to war with Iran because Pete Kegsbreath asked an LLM. Jesus fucking Christ.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 6 months ago

    So after bombing the school they'll blame it on AI instead of charge the generals for fucking war crimes. Yeah, I think we predicted this one.

  • source
  • [+] 21 points 6 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
    [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    So thats why we bombed a school.

  • source