Extending human ethics toward non-humans is a questionable endeavor at best. That being said, I personally don't like extra unnecessary suffering, which is why I prefer eating humanely raised and killed animals.

Taking the minimization of suffering to its logical conclusion, however, animals suffer in the wild without human intervention, so the most humane thing to do would be to exterminate them all. This would prevent any future suffering entirely.

Surely you see a problem with such a utilitarian approach?

I got downvotes for mentioning I'm planning on taking some of our overpopulated deer.

Maybe we should reintroduce wolves instead, eh?

What was the jury m/f ratio?

A very biased jury, save for one dude.

That's not what happened. She committed premeditated murder, with advance planning.

Most other furbearers will be infected with some sort of disease, parasite, bot fly larvae, etc. so they generally aren’t eaten

From first hand experience, groundhog tastes fucking amazing. Literally #2 spot on my personal list of favorite meats, right after minke whale. Just make sure it's cooked well done so you don't risk getting parasites. And if eaten, it's not just payback for destroying my garden, I'm actually getting some of those garden nutrients back.

Instead of an evaporative cooling tower, a heat exchanger with a ground loop could work.

Sounds like something the legislature could address.

Brushing aside moral considerations, cannibalism leads to things like kuru, so that's a no go either way.

I have no qualms eating animals, provided they weren't factory farmed.

How's that messed up? This is literally how the natural world works. Predators eat prey. We are the apex predator species.

Since i couldn’t fathom ever being able to finish my homework

But... why? Was it really so onerous?