Diva

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

but why is it so hard to not accept that other anarchists have different experiences than you?

It's not, I'm used to it. I'm not a fan of getting told I'm something other than what I am simply because of people's perception of me.

You think I'm "allying with" people because I don't feel comfortable being around anticommunists and made fun of the situation here.

I'm fine with the disengage rule, Im glad you are less aggressive at censorship than the rest of them, but I still found the behavior of baiting then disenaging something to make light of. I'm not going to tell you how to run your space.

Again I take your reading of me listing my experience as superiority as too sensitive. I get exasperated when I express something unorthodox and I get called a red fascist. In response I state my personal experience in organizing as an anarchist, to point out that making declaration about who is and isn't anarchist based on internet comments is silly.

I don't think posting anticommunism in the middle of widespread actual fascism is a good use of time, but I'm not going to say the people doing it aren't anarchists or are secretly fascists. The worst I might say for that is terminally online and misguided.

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 hours ago (7 children)

Other anarchists participating in anticommunist snark comms and towing the line on that front dissappoints and leaves me wary too, hence my mockery of this particular situation.

I pointed out that I'm actually active as an anarchist in the real world because people routinely claim that I am something else. If you read that as claiming superiority then I read your reading as projection.

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 hours ago (9 children)

isn't that what you were just doing by claiming that I have "allegiances and actions" that leave much to be desired by "many other anarchists"

turnabout is fair play, and the extent of my 'actions' and 'allegiances' that you claim "anarchists" disapprove of is entirely limited to posts on the Internet and thoughts in my head.

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 hours ago (11 children)

even though you behaviour has been defacto in defense of “left unity” which many anarchists reject outright.

Just as "many" anarchists may hold your specific opinions, I know plenty from years or organizing who are not as dogmatic about being sectarian. As I said I prefer to work with people like that just as you seem to prefer spaces like the anticommunist snark comms

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 6 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (13 children)

I brought it up because I've seen you engage in that in this very thread:

This just happened to be where I made my account 2 years ago, but clearly because of 'what .ml is" I can't be trusted. I will grant that you left yourself wiggle room by saying 'who knows', but you did say it was a valid assumption based on server.

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 8 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I’m OK to take Diva’s word for it that she’s an anarchist, but of course her allegiances and actions leave much to be desired by other anarchists like me, so it’s not like I would want to be in the same affinity group or anything.

The feeling is mutual, I prefer to organize with anarchists who are more interested in the work at hand than with policing each other's opinions.

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 7 points 11 hours ago (15 children)

Follow up question: if that is bullying then what does that say about the people doing the ongoing red scare smear campaign based on what server people are on?

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 8 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (17 children)

I came into a bait thread and made a joke about someone posting a bait thread and then telling pretty much everyone responding to the bait to disengage.

It's not that I have an issue with the rule, or intended to discourage people from using it, but because posting something incendiary and then dodging earnest responses to the bait with "disengage" is funny.

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 6 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (19 children)

You wrote that explicitly to shame people from using a rule meant to cool down comment sections,

that's quite an accusation, I think it's reasonable to infer insincerity from my words, but shame? I think that's coming from somewhere else. I was mostly being glib responding to someone calling your post bait.

you wrote that to promote the “left unity” delusion by jumping on the attempted bullying bandwagon, so their assumptions are rational

that's an awful lot to read into one word. I'm pretty sure I was just making a joke, sorry that it was at your expense but I don't think that's bullying.

Follow up question: if that was bullying then what does that say about the people doing red scare smear campaigns based on what server people are on?

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 10 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Soviet simping “anarchist”

Love the scare quotes, do you do any actual organizing as an anarchist or do you stick to posting?

I have plenty of criticisms of the USSR, I just don't care to participate in red scare circlejerks and that clearly rubs some people the wrong way.

on the .ml instance who posts like a hex

I've been here for years, it was literally my first instance and it was the most annoying Lemmy users constantly whining about hexbear that got me to start digging though their modlog and checking it out in the first place lmao.

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 9 points 20 hours ago (32 children)

quite a conclusion to jump from 'disengage' to that, plus I'm an anarchist

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 12 points 21 hours ago (34 children)

my kind? what is that supposed to be referring to?doggirl-sweat

 

😒

 

Hi all, thank you for reading my post. modlod link

In the 196 sub an OP was asking for advice on how to change their friends opinions which they disapprove of, because they were trying to warn them off of 'the tankie triad' and their friend didn't have any issues with what they were seeing and was in fact subscribed to a number of instance already.

Clocks got banned first after suggesting that the OP try to be a genuine friend and try to find some common cause in real life rather than alienating people over abstract geopolitical factionalism:

[> The original post feels like bait, but here is an authentic response.


Maybe genuinely be their friend instead of alienating them based on political flavoring. Perhaps you can be better working together to help others in your locality or communities than squandering over geopolitical matters. Swallow your frustrations, being annoyed is a part of being in a community. You can move on. ](https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/modlog?commentId=13347091)

I raised the issue that censoring earnest advice as 'tankie apologia' and preemtively writing off any common cause/ isolating people is no way to win people over either as friends or comrades.

I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but if 'genuinely be their friend' is 'tankie apologia' to be censored, I'm not sure you're going to be very successful convincing anyone of anything in the real world.

I then got banned for this one, for continuing to find 'the tankie triad' extremely silly:

yeah that's the context, I was just laughing because:

  1. only Lemmy users with an axe to grind call them that
  2. it sounds really silly, like they're a nemesis to dr venture.
  3. I'm supposed to be the melodramatic one yet every day I get one-upped 😔

link

screenshot:

I'm not here to tell them how to run their comm, my position is that this is way more draconian than anything I've run into in any of 'the tankie triad'. The same groups of people loudly complaining about censorship on 'tankie' run instances don't seem to have a problem enforcing vague/arbitrary vibes based censorship in their spaces.

 

Get our asses

stolen from xiaohongshu

-1
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by Diva@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
 

Get our asses

stolen from xiaohongshu

 

I don't expect this to play particularly well here, and maybe I'm just being conspiratorial, but here goes:

I banned jordanlund@lemmy.world from !transgender@lemmy.blahajzone earlier today- he literally posted a matt walsh youtube link and was being otherwise transphobic in a space where that gets you banned. (link)

one of jordanlunds removed comments w/ matt walsh video:

spoiler

the reason I put down was 'trolling about neopronouns' I stand by that, it was violating instance rules and was unacceptable behavior from a moderator of another instance.

Shortly after that I got banned from news@lemmy.world for 'trolling'. To be clear, jordanlund does not moderate news@lemmy.world, but the timing struck me as an odd coincidence.

The .world thread in question (link)

I was expressing my actual opinion/position on this, if anything the post I was replying to should be considered a rule 1 violation implying leftists are russian/under russian sway:

spoiler

The removed comments that I was banned (permanent) for were just me being earnest about my position, which you're welcome to disagree with.

I don't view protecting my rights as something worth sacrificing other people for, even if they're on the other side of the planet. You can be mad at me or hate me for that, but I'm not trolling.

People replying felt it was reasonable to call me an idiot for example, yet another example of selective moderation. on .world.

I don't have any conclusive proof that my banning Jordanlund and then getting banned are related other than the suspicious timing, I welcome clarification.

Anyway in the interest of neutrality and transparency I submit both my ban and jordanlunds for review.

update

0
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by Diva@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
 

Americans in the comments: I get 2 holidays a year

 
view more: next ›