blind3rdeye

joined 2 years ago
[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 1 points 21 hours ago

It’s crazy how you missed that point yet harp about intelligence.

I'm not sure why you said that. The person you are responding didn't 'miss that point'. They were themselves pointing out that other people have missed it. You are both criticising people for missing the same point.

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

I'd rather download a bear than download a strange man, that's for sure.

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 14 points 5 days ago (2 children)

And also, the guy has to be hot.

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 20 points 1 week ago

I honestly don't have a strong sense of how Tate can be so popular. But if I had to guess, I'd say the "no sense of community" is probably the biggest thing.

The internet has become a gathering place where communities and social bonds are formed. I can imagine a heap of people who are struggling socially in the real world seeing, and then seeing Tate and his community offer an 'answer' to that - supporting those who feel rejected, and putting the blame squarely on others. That's what I see as the draw that brings people in. They feel safe and secure in their haven of hatred. Any opposition to them is from people that are weaker and less important. -- Which then makes leaving the group almost impossible, because you'd have to degrade your own view of yourself - joining the people who you think are weaker and less important.

So this Tate thing is rot that has taken root because of a gap in more healthy support structures. (I don't see an easy solution for it though!)

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

:)

Yeah, maybe "trash" is a bit harsh. But it definitely isn't on the same level as 2; and it has a lot of problems. Even the turning off power thing was a bit weird. I'm certain the top-side could easily outlast the under-city in that kind of standoff. I'm not really sure why they needed the power back so urgently. There didn't seem to be a lot of critical infrastructure, and most people living there didn't have any tech that could use the power anyway.

Master was said to be really smart and knowledgeable and important, but I don't recall seeing him demonstrating that at any point. He seemed to just command other people to fix stuff and do stuff. And even when he lost that command, he was still never shown actually doing anything or sharing knowledge. So it was a bit of a mystery to me why the others thought he was important.

... And why was he in the thunderdome cage? "Two men enter, one man leaves" was a big deal; and the guards definitely did not want to open the gates. But then suddenly, inexplicably, Master is just standing right next to them in the cage. Like, wtf is he doing in there? -- Ok... I'll shut up. I do take back saying it was 'trash', but I definitely don't think its a good movie.

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, I definitely don't blame her for the movie's faults. She was very good.

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To clarify, I didn't mean "basic" as a negative thing. (That's the kind of word association that someone might have if they grew up with the Marvel universe - but I'm older than that!) I was trying to say that it was tightly focused on the core ideas. I like that movie. It was not a criticism, but it was not exactly what I expected.

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

Fair call. It didn't occur to me to do that, but I understand why you'd prefer it. Originally I was actually naming the groups; but I changed my mind.

 

I recently watched Mad Max I, II, and III for the first time; since I know they are hit movies that influence a lot of popular culture. I've already seen Fury Road a couple of times, and I reckon that's an excellent movie - so I figure I'd give the others a shot. Here are some of my thoughts:

I found that MM1 is surprisingly basic. The world is not yet 'post apocalyptic'. The story is clean and simple, and there is very little world-building. It actually reminds me of Duel. A decent movie, but no really big ideas.

MM2 is what people really mean when they talk about Mad Max. This sets the post apocalyptic scene that so many things are now inspired by. The plot is more involved than the first; but it is tight and believable. I could nit-pick at this, but It's a very good movie; and it is a cultural touchstone for wasteland post-apoc type settings.

MM3 is trash. Don't bother watching this unless you're a super-fan who just needs more content. It feels like the writers were told to make another MM movie, and so they had a good brainstorming session to get some good ideas for what could happen; but then that's all. The movie is a grab-bag of inconsistent junk, just lurching from one setting to another in ways that don't really make sense. They've got about 3 movies worth of story arc, but only half-a-movie worth of details. It does have some alright visuals and action scenes, and a couple of novel ideas, but overall it is a bad movie.

--

Fury Road feels a lot like a refreshed and modernised version of Mad Max 2. (There are a lot of things that I like about Fury Road; but I'll save those comments for another time.)

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 17 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It's pretty standard to play both extremes simultaneously, and people just pick whichever they want to relate to at any given moment.

eg.

  • (such-and-such group) are lazy, but also they are taking all the jobs.
  • They are stupid, but also have secret organisations that control the world, with mind-control, and lasers that control the weather, etc.
  • They are snowflakes obsessed with inclusiveness, but also they want (target-minority-group) to take over.
  • They are against free speech; and we must silence them.

I'm sure others can think of more, and variations on those.

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 39 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

The full list: https://code.gouv.fr/sill/list

Hold on. That page does not list VLC or KeePass. Is there more info about this other than the list? Or is the info in the title of this post incorrect?

[edit]

I see now. The page does not list VLC or KeePass, but those two both do come up if you put them into the search box. The software listed on the page is a very long list, but it is apparently on the 'most popular' stuff - not the entire list. (Although it is strange to see a heap of niche stuff, and stuff I've never heard of on the 'most popular' list while VLC doesn't make the cut.)

I'm not sure this list is a very strong endorsement by the French Government. It seems to just be listing free software options, and then asking other people to sign up to say which ones they use.

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago

It does kind of feel like the UN could use a refresh. In particular, the veto powers given to certain countries feels bad. There may be good reasons for that system, but the system is not good - and the details of the reasons have definitely shifted over time such that the choice of countries with veto power is now highly questionable.

 

I have an old gmail account. I stopped actively using this account many years ago, but I'm still keeping it open for various reasons. I just sign in once a year or so, delete a few bits of spam, then log out.

Yesterday when I tried to log in to do this, Google wanted a phone number to verify my identity. It would not allow me to log in without a verification code from a phone. I tried to find a way around this. I clicked 'try another option', which then asked for the 'last password I remember'. I tried the current password, and the previous password that I had before that - but just told me that this was not enough to verify my identity.

I checked the Google help centre. Following its chain of questions basically told me that the only reason Google would do this is if I had activated two-factor authentication, or if someone else had got control of the account (and then activated two-factor authentication). ... I'm sure I didn't do this, and I very much doubt someone else had the account.

Reluctantly, I put in my phone number (which I know Google has had in the past, because I use to use this as my main account). The first time, I left off the area code, and Google told me that the number wasn't registered with the account. But then with the area code, the phone number worked and I was able to log in. So clearly it did have that number on record.

The very first thing I did was to try to remove any mention of this phone number from the account. But it wasn't mentioned. There were no phone numbers listed as registered to the account, and two factor authentication was turned off. I couldn't find any mention of that phone number anywhere in my account, nor find any way to delete it. Nevertheless, it was required when I wanted to sign in.

So I'm somewhat concerned. I don't want this number registered to the account in any way. I don't want to ever have to use it to verify my identity. I don't want it to be associated with my identity. Google doesn't show me that the number is associated with my account, but obviously it is - because it was required for me to log in!

Google has lots of 'helpful' pages about what personal information they store, and how you can delete it. But this experience highlights that they definitely store more than is shown in the profile page, and that there is no built-in way to ask for it to be deleted (or to even know what the information is). It makes me wonder what other personal information they have secretly stored. Probably a lot.

I'm wondering what steps I should take to have this personal data removed. I'm under the impression that there are GDPR laws which might compel Google to delete personal data if I request it to be deleted. But it isn't clear what data they have; and it definitely isn't clear how to contact them.

view more: next ›