buffalobuffalo

joined 2 years ago

Haven't seen conventions mentioned in this thread. Big or small, cons give me the "i don't belong here" feels

[–] buffalobuffalo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Have you heard of heat rash (miliara rubra)?

It's not mosquitos, but your description of fiberglass and needles reminds me of this. It feels like each of my pores on my back has a needle in it when it happens.

on the contrary people look at me and become homophobic 😎

  • tired *Tired *tired
[–] buffalobuffalo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

##PWM Dimming

in digital electronics, it's hard to send 30% power but easy to send either 0% or 100% power (full off or full on). So instead, to dim a light, we can just turn a light off and on really quickly. If you turn it off 70% of the time, and turn it on 30% of the time, it'll look like the light is at 30% brightness - if you do it quickly enough. But doing things faster is also difficult, so sometimes it's fast enough that we can't perceive it turning on and off, but slow enough that it still causes issues in sensitive people.

Fun fact: if you see LED lights blinking in videos, but not when looking at it in real life, that's when the PWM dimming frequency doesn't quite match up with the camera's shutter speed or framerate. This is known as aliasing: when there's a slight mismatch in frequency of two evenly-spaced patterns, and combining them results in a new pattern.

Dithering

Not sure exactly what kind of dithering they're referring to, but I'm going to guess it's color dithering.

If you only have white and black pieces of paper, but you want to make gray, you might cut them up and arrange them in a checkerboard pattern. If you view it from far enough away, you might perceive it as gray rather than pure black or white.

This is basically what dithering attempts to do: when you can't mix colors, it's a method of representing more colors than you actually are able to use by patterning them in certain ways.

Not knowledgeable enough about screens to know why fans are worried about dithering, or why Nintendo might have been considering using it in the first place though.

Also: Rustdesk, Anydesk, TeamViewer, and Spice

If I believe the mod of the community in question is telling the truth, Seems like the incident in question was just a misunderstanding. The community name is

spoileradorableporn

I will refer to this as "the first community" in the following text.

The mod of the community copy/pasted the dictionary definition from vocabulary.com, which contains the word "childlike".

IMO, the community in question is not trying to skirt the line of Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM). In fact, there is a subreddit of the same name which has absolutely nothing to do with people that appear underage.

That said, the same mod also moderates, and posts to a different community with a concerning name. The spoiler below shows the name and the first three paragraphs of the sidebar as they appear:

spoilerCommunity is now open to posting. Posts not having verification info will be removed.

FauxBait is a place for sharing images and videos of the youngest-looking, legal-aged (18+) girls. If you like fresh, young starlets, this is the place for you!

Just to be clear: We only feature legal, consenting adults in accordance with U.S. Laws. All models featured were at least 18 years old at the time of filming.


Also, I'm not sure if the timestamps can be trusted, but said mod was instated as the only active mod of the first community at the same time that Ada made this post, which would mean that the mod account could not have been the one that wrote the original sidebar of the first community. Not sure what to make of that. For the sake of balance though, said mod does seem to be doing verifications of the age requirements. Also, the modlog for the first community shows two admin removals from at least 10 days before this debacle, both of which err on the side of caution, so at least the admins to seem to care about enforcing their rules.


The situation seems very muddy, but I personally don't think the original incident was that big of a deal (assuming the mod is telling the truth). However, I certainly don't blame the blahaj admins for defederating as it's certainly the safest option. Wouldn't want blahaj lemmy to get taken down :| Also happy to see less pron in my feed; I'm too lazy to block the individual /c/. Personal Instance-level blocking can't come soon enough.