dead

joined 4 years ago
[–] dead@hexbear.net 23 points 4 days ago

I am clarifying because right wing twitter have declared the shooter to be a left wing radical. I'm suspecting right wingers will create conspiracy theories similar to the David DePape situation, where they claimed that the attack was motivated by a lover's quarrel.

[–] dead@hexbear.net 57 points 4 days ago (5 children)

I'm highly doubting that the motivation of the shooter was that he supported free healthcare. The suspected shooter worked for private security, had US military ties, and owned a cop car.

[–] dead@hexbear.net 25 points 4 days ago (6 children)

https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-vance-boelter-e-d-d-b7814715 can't archive this page.

[–] dead@hexbear.net 40 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This is the suspect that the police announced. He's very fed-coded. I think he's also South African.

[–] dead@hexbear.net 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The devs have said that all of the poe 2 engine code is being backported to poe 1. They may have already backported much of it. There is no "I can only play poe 2 because poe 1 code is bad". It's the same code.

[–] dead@hexbear.net 2 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Both games run on mostly the same code. POE2's game engine is based on POE1's code. There's even examples where POE1 features have accidentally been left in POE2, example: the POE2 anointment window prompted you to use tainted oil, an item which doesn't exist in POE2.

For performance issues, update your graphics driver, delete the game graphics cache files.

[–] dead@hexbear.net 1 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Try POE 1. Follow the pohx guide for new players. The next poe2 expansion is probably August.

https://pohx.net/

[–] dead@hexbear.net 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The title is kind of confusing. The WSWS (trotskyist newspaper) has declared Mikie Sherrill to be a CIA asset because she was in the US Navy. She's not openly CIA like Elissa Slotkin.

[–] dead@hexbear.net 2 points 6 days ago

I think they have new submarines in the works. DPRK received a lot of new technology from Russia.

[–] dead@hexbear.net 19 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

https://hexbear.net/post/5165751 (1 week ago) The ship was refloated.

https://hexbear.net/post/5000472 (3 weeks ago) The ship capsized on launch.

https://hexbear.net/post/4706390 (2 months) A different ship of the same size was successfully launched.

 

Entry into U.S. Is Not Matter of Our Interest: International Affairs Analyst

Pyongyang, June 10 (KCNA) -- Kim Myong Chol, an international affairs analyst of the DPRK, issued the following article titled "Entry into the U.S. is not a matter of our interest" on June 9:

Recently, the U.S. announced a measure to designate the peoples of 19 countries as the subjects of ban to entry into the U.S. under the pretext of "threat" to its national security.

The arrogant acts of the U.S., which is self-righteous, exclusive and racist, are now faced with strong denunciation and rejection of the international community.

Of course, it is a matter belonging to the sphere of sovereign rights of a relevant country to restrict and control the entry of foreigners.

Nevertheless, the above-said measure taken by the U.S. is incurring a censure of the international community because it is used as a malicious political tool for discriminating and pressurizing other countries.

Great irony is that there is strange interpretation that the Democratic People's Republic of Korea was not included in the subjects of the U.S. ban on entry and this measure may reflect the U.S. administration's carrot stand towards the DPRK to open the door to the resumption of dialogue between the two countries.

This cannot be interpreted otherwise than one-sided judgment not knowing well the past and present relations between the DPRK and the U.S.

In 2017, the first term of office, the present U.S. administration included the DPRK in the list of countries subject to entry ban to the U.S. for the unjust reason that it refused to cooperate with the U.S. government and did not meet the demand for sharing information, and maintained it throughout its ruling.

This year when the second term of office began, the U.S. re-designated the DPRK as an "uncooperative state in combating terrorism" and extended again the effect of the measure for totally banning the U.S. citizens' trip to the DPRK.

The reason why the U.S. does not include the DPRK in the list can be explained only by the U.S., whether it is purely for technical reason or for political purpose.

But one obvious fact is that we are not interested in the least in the matter of entry into the U.S.

Even if the present U.S. administration has not placed the DPRK intentionally on the list of countries subject to entry ban, the DPRK is not interested in it and has no reason to be glad.

The U.S., which is the most hostile country to the DPRK and where xenophobia and racial discrimination have been established as a social climate and all sorts of social evils flood, can never be welcomed as the destination of the DPRK citizens' trip.

Shortly ago, the vice-president, the second-ranking person of the present U.S. administration, denounced a U.S. university for lacking "ideological diversity" and made absurd sophism about the political system of the DPRK. This is another typical example why the DPRK has repugnance for the U.S.

If the present U.S. administration thinks that the DPRK will accept the allowing of the entry into the U.S. as a "gift" which it neither thinks nor wants, it is miscalculation.

It is not the matter of the DPRK's concern that the U.S. unilaterally makes illegal regulations outside and places the DPRK in them or not. I think that the Democratic People's Republic of Korea will, in the future, too, not welcome the entry of Americans into it.

This is a just and legitimate exercise of sovereign rights to defend the state and social system and the welfare of the people from all hostile threats of the U.S. and is quite different from the U.S. prejudiced prohibition measure on entry with malicious intention.

The DPRK will not evaluate the U.S. actions on the basis of someone's hopeful observations or subjective interpretation. It will face the U.S. on the basis of the reality and by relying on its own independent judgment. -0-
www.kcna.kp (2025.06.10.)

http://kcna.kp/en/article/q/bc4fd4528da8471979b7f7f951025135.kcmsf

https://archive.is/itHZt (kcna)

 

https://xcancel.com/ACPMain/status/1931768512009097543#m

This is the Jackson Hinkle and Haz Al-Din party.

 

buddy-christ

Dogma is a comedy film about Catholicism. The movie is part of the Jay and Silent Bob series. Two fallen angels, played by Ben Affleck and Matt Damon, are trying to end the universe through a "loophole" in Catholicism. Bethany, an abortion clinic worker is tasked with stopping the end of existence. She gets help from Jay and Silent Bob.

Dogma was in copyright limbo because the film was owned by sex criminal Harvey Weinstein (Miramax Films). Miramax sold the rights to the film in June 2024. The film was sold to film company Iconic Events.

 

The grieving parents of a 7-year-old child who died hours after being hit by a car were charged with involuntary manslaughter after allowing him and his brother, 10, to walk home unaccompanied by an adult from a nearby grocery store.

The 76-year-old driver will not face any charges.

The Food Lion store is two blocks away from their home. The parents said the children were with their mother when they asked to meet their father at the store, and she allowed them to leave

Gastonia police declined to comment to NBC News, but said in a statement that “there is no evidence of speeding or wrongdoing on the part of the driver, therefore no charges have been filed. The driver continues to be cooperative and the incident remains under active investigation by the Gastonia Police Department’s Traffic Division.”

Ivey, the mother, told WSOC before her arrest that it was the first time had she let the children walk alone. “It was just devastating, I’m still in shock, I’m in shock,” she said. “It’s hard, I haven’t stopped crying; my husband hasn’t stopped crying. Honestly, I want justice for my baby.”

view more: next ›