plyth

Nach h. M. kann auch bereits die Mitgliedschaft in einer verfassungsfeindlichen Organisation Zweifel an der Verfassungstreue begründen.

https://www.rechtslexikon.net/d/verfassungstreue/verfassungstreue.htm

Gesichert rechtsextrem ist aber nicht verfassungsfeindlich. Bei der Einstufung geht es nur um den Umfang der Überwachung.

Es gilt sogar

aber allein die Mitgliedschaft in einer verfassungsfeindlichen Organisation für eine Ablehnung nicht ausreichend sein läßt, sondern eine Prüfung jedes Einzelfalles verlangt

Damit gilt das Gegenteil, selbst ein AfD Verbot reicht nicht.

Die Tagesschau vermeidet leider eine genaue Analyse der Rechtslage.

Rein rechtlich gesehen kann es doch nicht unklar sein. Solange die AfD nicht verboten ist müssen Konsequenzen illegale Diskriminierung sein. Nach einem Verbot sind Konsequenzen Pflicht. Korrekt wäre dann, wenn dies nur für Menschen gilt, die sich weiter engagieren. Gesetze dürfen nicht rückwirkend etwas bestrafen das legal war.

That door is locked.

The cartoon is apt. It's even worse. Pilots don't fly without the approval of airline management.

The door to the cockpit is locked. If there has been a discussion or if there is just this vote, the powerlessness of those regular passengers shows that anti-intellectualism is an isolated problem. It only looks dangerous to those who don't remember the locked door.

Could be. What I wanted to say is that the sample size is bigger than two if the community cannot come up with successful bootstrapping stories.

How should a secret society remove such a video without silencing the author?

https://xkcd.com/1425/

It is easier to do the above three things. Removing a video draws attention to it because the author will post it on other channels. Other people will upload it to check the claim that it is removed.

It's much easier to drown a problematic video in other content so that only few people discover it. So some people know the real truth, but nobody believes them or cares about them.

I don't have better proof. For me it was enough because I also read the comments and there don't seem to be many success stories.

There is only one choice: feeling or rationality.

When you feel, you do what feels best.

When you think, you do what is the most valuable.

So no free will but that choice.

It's enough to show that escaping poverty is not trivial.

Check the YT videos of people who said the same and voluntarily tried to escape a life at the bottom. It's a comforting illusion that one could hustle onself back into 'normal' life. I have seen two attempts, and both gave up.

I am sorry. It was meant as a dark joke but totally flopped.

The link is still helpful. There is not much room for improvement if the current situation is good enough for most people.