rursta

joined 2 months ago
[–] rursta@retrolemmy.com 1 points 2 hours ago

you're replying to TrickDacy@lemmy.world’s latest alt.. It's soo obvious when you look at his profile

[–] rursta@retrolemmy.com 0 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)
[–] rursta@retrolemmy.com 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] rursta@retrolemmy.com -1 points 17 hours ago

I think you misread the meme if think this is dooming your campaign. But thank goodness you're are now aware capitalists want to violently kill you. It’ll definitively solve their problem of you not paying rents to them.

Awarenesses is indeed the first step!
How is that self-defense coming?
for the better?

[–] rursta@retrolemmy.com -1 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

Did you really came back to reply to project your procapitalist-ganda on a reply about counting my breathing? Why haven't you syndicated yet and libre-published your theoretical ❝FOSS NES❞? Did Nintendo license you, or you're using their computer voided of warranty?

[–] rursta@retrolemmy.com 2 points 1 day ago

lol, faster than Mark Warren

[–] rursta@retrolemmy.com 1 points 1 day ago

Capital must consume even the universal soup!!

[–] rursta@retrolemmy.com -1 points 1 day ago (7 children)

the tyrants🧵 want me to compensate them for being the ❝first person❞ to count upto a number that makes their stupid FAMICOM run ❝just the way they like it❞
everyone else be damned!

[–] rursta@retrolemmy.com -2 points 1 day ago

You can digitize your art indeed, but the corresponding number it ends becoming, doesn't belong to you, or your demand to monopolize its usage.

Letters are art, as scripts and calligraphy are. Demanding compensation under no jurisdiction than your own is tyranny.

Fuck off.

Enjoy your slavery, prole.

[–] rursta@retrolemmy.com -3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Sharing your art, or keeping it yours only is your choice indeed. But numbers are not art, and your desire to monopolize who gets to copy numbers or not demonstrates your desire to privatize numbers: which is tyranny.

You can request compensation for writing indeed, but you have to ask yourself if you are willing to censor others’ press to copy your writings. At what point are you willing to use violence to maintain that monopoly?

Publishers have already chosen to use the states to sue to slavery for those rents.

[–] rursta@retrolemmy.com -4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

You're telling on your own tyranny.
Freedom of pressers desire the absolute liberation of press. If your FOSS NES is in the Torah, or can be extracted from it from simple indexical logic, is your FOSS NES really laboured?

I can see you requesting compensation for labor made into formatting the Torah into a NES format for a game. But numbers do not belong to you, or should they.

 

Yes, it's not the first time. Yes, I am livid.

 
 
 

cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/technology/p/1131723/roblox-must-face-iowa-consumer-fraud-claims

cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/tech/p/1130290/roblox-must-face-iowa-consumer-fraud-claims

Full Ruling.

On May 13, 2026, the Iowa District Court for Polk County issued a ruling allowing Iowa's consumer fraud lawsuit against Roblox Corporation to move forward.

The Court denied Roblox’s attempt to dismiss the core of Iowa's lawsuit and determined that the suit may move forward with its deception claims and certain unfair practice claims. The claims maintain that Roblox purposefully misled parents by misrepresenting both the quantity and the quality of its safety tools.

The Court's decision allows the following arguments made by the Attorney General’s Office to continue:

  • Roblox falsely promised a "safety review of every uploaded image, audio, and video file" to create a false sense of security;
  • Roblox intentionally misrepresented the amount of violent and sexual content on its platform to secure lower age ratings on various app stores;
  • Roblox uses unfair practices, including the default allowance of adult-child communications and the misleading implementation of in-game currency;
  • Roblox lacks sufficient parental controls and fails to warn users about potential harm.

Importantly, the Court rejected Roblox's attempt to evade the Iowa Consumer Fraud Act by arguing its platform is not "merchandise" simply because it is free to play. Noting that Roblox profits by selling user data and in-game currency, the Court ruled that exempting companies like Roblox under their “free” argument would “create a large loophole.”

view more: next ›