▲ 640 ▼ Shoulda listened (europe.pub) submitted 1 day ago by cm0002@lemy.lol to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev 113 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] RedFrank24@piefed.social 33 points 20 hours ago (9 children) .Net has been chugging along quite nicely for decades now. permalink fedilink source hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 hours ago* Last place I worked at that abused used .Net was serving an angular web app to interface with a c++ BE using soap. Now that sounds sane, until they made their own C++ to CSS transpiler to be able define the ui in back end code. Like angular written in c++ translated through .Net. Through no fault of .Net I just can't get past those flashbacks. To be fair that's only like top 5 most fucked up code I saw there. permalink fedilink source parent [–] marlowe221@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago .NET is the single best thing Microsoft makes. It’s fast, multi platform (all mine runs in Linux containers), and the developer tools are pretty good too. I really HATE that Microsoft made it, but I love C# and .NET. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 9 points 16 hours ago I blame Microsoft for that permalink fedilink source parent [–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 21 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (3 children) And COBAL COBOL just won't die. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] daddycool@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago It better not. I've invested all my money in it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] stevestevesteve@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago (1 child) COBOL* permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago Stupid phone permalink fedilink source parent [–] DacoTaco@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 child) As backend code, yes. As a web (web, not api. As an api platform they're great) platform... No. Asp.net and mvc were imo a disaster, silverlight was... Oof. Then there is maui which could have done it using blazor but just... Didnt. ... And then there is blazor itself. Though blazor is imo the best of all the web platforms they had, and i like it, it still has very rough edges and is not gonna replace javascript any time soon. Hell, microsoft cant even decently support their own web ui platform ( fluentui ) because their backbone ( webcomponents ) is completely broke ( or did v3 FINALLY release? ). There are other blazor frameworks but they all seem to not take full advantage of blazor and its disgusting. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] nek0d3r@midwest.social 1 point 8 hours ago What about modern ASP.NET? It feels pretty good these days honestly. I even really like the newer minimal API features permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 hours ago* Last place I worked at that abused used .Net was serving an angular web app to interface with a c++ BE using soap. Now that sounds sane, until they made their own C++ to CSS transpiler to be able define the ui in back end code. Like angular written in c++ translated through .Net. Through no fault of .Net I just can't get past those flashbacks. To be fair that's only like top 5 most fucked up code I saw there. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] marlowe221@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago .NET is the single best thing Microsoft makes. It’s fast, multi platform (all mine runs in Linux containers), and the developer tools are pretty good too. I really HATE that Microsoft made it, but I love C# and .NET. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 9 points 16 hours ago I blame Microsoft for that permalink fedilink source parent
[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 21 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (3 children) And COBAL COBOL just won't die. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] daddycool@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago It better not. I've invested all my money in it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] stevestevesteve@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago (1 child) COBOL* permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago Stupid phone permalink fedilink source parent
[–] daddycool@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago It better not. I've invested all my money in it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] stevestevesteve@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago (1 child) COBOL* permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago Stupid phone permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DacoTaco@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 child) As backend code, yes. As a web (web, not api. As an api platform they're great) platform... No. Asp.net and mvc were imo a disaster, silverlight was... Oof. Then there is maui which could have done it using blazor but just... Didnt. ... And then there is blazor itself. Though blazor is imo the best of all the web platforms they had, and i like it, it still has very rough edges and is not gonna replace javascript any time soon. Hell, microsoft cant even decently support their own web ui platform ( fluentui ) because their backbone ( webcomponents ) is completely broke ( or did v3 FINALLY release? ). There are other blazor frameworks but they all seem to not take full advantage of blazor and its disgusting. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] nek0d3r@midwest.social 1 point 8 hours ago What about modern ASP.NET? It feels pretty good these days honestly. I even really like the newer minimal API features permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nek0d3r@midwest.social 1 point 8 hours ago What about modern ASP.NET? It feels pretty good these days honestly. I even really like the newer minimal API features permalink fedilink source parent