you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 113 points 1 day ago (37 children)

Turns out a business plan consisting of »build a trillion dollars of server farms now, figure out who pays later« gets slightly less charming once the lenders ask for actual numbers. The AI industry wanted to disrupt every profession except the ancient art of checking whether the math works.

  • source
  • hideshow 37 child comments
  • [–] 72 points 1 day ago (8 children)

    "We plan to shoot for the moon and land on a pile of money" classic Silicon Valley businessplan.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 day ago (7 children)

    Considering how tech CEOs are acting, with their bunkers, bodyguards, remote islands and rockets, I'm not sure they planned to come back after leaving with all our money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 day ago* (5 children)

    leaving with all our money.

    Talk is they're planning on staying away while money and debts inflates away to zero and come back with all the deeds when the fighting stops.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    Don't you need a functioning government for a deed to have value?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    What do you think the private militaries are for?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

    What are you going use to pay them?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 hours ago

    The promise of being one tier above the rest once their new world is in place.

    The promise of not having to be reduced to mere farmers, cattle herders and other manual labourers.

    The promise of not being the oppressed but the helping hand of the oppressor.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 1 day ago (8 children)

    Isn't this also how the dot-com bubble sort of happened?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

    This one has everyone's retirement money tied into it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    The next one will be one same. Humans don't learn from mistakes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    The AI bust will be an order of magnitude worse. The money involved is staggering. AI is almost all of America's GPD and a monster chunk of stock valuation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 day ago

    Yep, and like the dot-com bubble, businesses have tied themselves too closely with AI to the point it'll be harder to backtrack and pull out than with the dot-com boom. At least word of mouth and having a website were easily separable from the business end. Having a website and integrating AI into your website and your business is a whole different story.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -21 points 1 day ago (18 children)

    As someone on the inside, I can assure you that the buyers put down money up front for a specified product and delivery date. There is no speculation involved. They line up to give us money. Unless Microsoft et al. goes bankrupt, we keep building.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 day ago* (4 children)

    It's not an issue of prediction, or prophesy, it's that all the available information right now looks like a classic bubble. could it find profitably? idk. is it profitable? No. is there billions or trillions in debt changing hands too fast for anyone to keep track of? yes. is someone selling somke? most likely these are the situations in which con artists thrive. probably not everyone is intending to sell smoke. but not all of this is going to work out, some may come out on top, but some will fall, and that will be a bubble.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Going a step further, the builders that build with environmental and community concerns first are more likely to endure. My company does exactly that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    FTA:

    Drawing on data from regulatory intelligence outfit RegLayer, the FT reports that 47 large data center projects have already fallen through this year. Analysts at the equity research firm Bernstein only believe that about 35 percent of planned facilities are feasible.

    Would you dispute these claims, based on your experience?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

    Not at all. Most builders are clueless. They think that because they have money, they can solve any problems.

    Edit: Adding that site selection is HARD. Every developer with a spare farm plot wants in on the action. Most are completely inappropriate.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 day ago (5 children)

    lmao, which department do you work in that you're on lemmy right now? Mail, or maybe food service?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 1 day ago (4 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    So, HR? I would delete your location, btw. Don't out yourself.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    There are more than a dozen datacenters within 30 minutes of my home.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    So, many are getting blocked and the AI bubble is going to pop in the next few years. Right now, this is where we stand. Notice, most are getting built where there is a lack of cool weather and water. Many states are starting to fight them because of this.

    https://www.electricchoice.com/datacenters/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 12 hours ago

    Honestly, I am confused by the rushed build out. If I was wealthy, I would be trying to ensure that my wealth isn't being burned away for nothing. Having properly placed and authorized data centers would help protect my investment.

    The Dotcom bubble and the 2008 housing crisis are still in living memory. Are the wealthy just that unaware - or worse, uncaring - about how things could play out? 🤨

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago (5 children)
  • [–] -3 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    If we are not going to have honest discussion, why participate? Lemmy should be better.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    So a post making claims against all visible evidence with no proof for any of it is "honest discussion"?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    You ask "why believe me?" I ask " why take you seriously?" And we get nowhere.

    The popular opinion is framed in view of the worst offenders. That gets clicks. My daily experience shows me that:

    • one urinal in my building uses more water in a day than the datacenter does in a year.
    • our generators run at less than 65 dB at full tilt at a distance of 30 feet. They are only run during utility outages - and monthly tests for 10 minutes.
    • we build in corporate parks and remote sites with surplus power.
    • the power substation we paid for and built delivers 20 MW back to the community. We added capacity to the local area on our dime.

    However, others are not like us. Musk runs gas turbines for primary power. MS uses open- loop cooling. They get the headlines. We don't. Our business is based on responsible behavior. But we get painted with the same brush.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Ok, even assuming all that is true (just saying it doesnt make it so) none of it has anything to do with the inherent unprofitability of AI. Anthropic alone is reporting an $80 billion loss for the year. Last I heard the industry as a whole needs to make a few trillion dollars just to break even. Regardless of how efficient or not your particular data center may be, it's not going to fill that gap.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -9 points 1 day ago

    Agreed. Oai, Anthro, etc don't necessarily have paths forward. But a LOT of folks want their hands on the results. Perhaps real open sw will rise to put them under and no one will need to pay for the models. But they will have to pay for the hardware to run it. And that's pricey. And we get paid up front.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago

    I hate AI too but nothing this person is saying rings untrue to me. Even the article admits that data centers continue to be built, albeit slower. I know we all want the bubble to pop, but that could still be a ways off.

  • source
  • parent