you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 36 points 1 day ago (11 children)

if he can run so can obama.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago

    Their spin for it work for Trump and not Obama is that they claim the intent was no more than two "consecutive terms" but consecutive or anything of the like does not even appear. It says once you're elected to two terms you're ineligible for any more, and can even block you from running as the vice president so he can't pull a "run as VD Vance's VP and have him resign" bullshit.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago (8 children)

    Obama has absolutely no interest in this shit show. That's half the joke of the current state of the Presidency. You need to either be a grifter, a soulless climber, or a senile coot to pursue the job at this point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago* (3 children)

    Does this mean there should be a nonpartisan Presidium?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (2 children)

    I'm hearing good things about a Triumvirate executive branch

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    From what I've read, there was a proposed amendment that would overhaul the executive branch to where three people would act as a collective head of state and government. I think three presidents in the same office would be more interesting than just one.

    https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/100854445

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment