I dunno. Your initial comment seemed to be misunderstanding or misconstruing (or at worst dismissive) the data shared in the article, focusing your analysis on one point, making it inaccurate. My response was to highlight that there is more data available.

You then didn't really consider the additional data and instead moved on to a different topic based off a part of my response which was to mention an Israeli politician (considered left). That part of my response was to show that the Left vs Right paradigm as we know it doesn't apply to Israeli politics when their center-left also advocate for genocide (which makes the fact that more Israelis identify with being right-wing all the more concerning, since even the center-left advocate for genocide).

It was a terse response because the only interaction we've had is one where you seem to have misconstrued information and then been deflective/changed topic to something unrelated (considering that Yair Golan is not "anti-genocide" as referenced by prior points, he doesn't even have a seat in parliament). So I'm not quite sure what you're getting at.