this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
292 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

70249 readers
3484 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
292
We did the math on AI’s energy footprint. Here’s the story you haven’t heard. (www.technologyreview.com)
submitted 1 day ago by kalkulat@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
139 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Absolutely needed: to get high efficiency for this beast ... as it gets better, we'll become too dependent.

"all of this growth is for a new technology that’s still finding its footing, and in many applications—education, medical advice, legal analysis—might be the wrong tool for the job,,,"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

That's a huge amount of electricity even at it's lowest. Are they building the AI to crypto mine is also another question. I could see these sneaky bastards combining the two somehow.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't see how AI helps with crypto mining. It could help with pump and dumping shit coins though.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I was thinking how it probably helps by getting into nanoseconds with buying and selling stocks. I have found that there are very few coincidences with huge technologies, tons of cash pouring in and dark money. I could be wrong though.

[–] DaPorkchop_@lemmy.ml 2 points 14 hours ago

Trading has nothing to do with cryptocurrency mining. Also, any high-frequency trading firm worth their salt is using FPGAs for the things where performance really counts.

[–] Loduz_247@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As for OpenAI and Microsoft, they're betting on energy with a company called Helion Energy. They say they'll have it ready by 2028. Whether they'll achieve that? We'll see.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I looked that up and it's a fusion reactor, apparently, from what I can figure out from their nigh-illegible website.

...[reads further] ...

It skips the steam cycle. That's fucking cool. I really hope they get it working.

[–] eleitl@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They won't.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Care to elaborate?

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 11 hours ago

there's lots of handwavy things. They even said they "discovered new physics" to explain some disappointing (perfectly predictable, by other established nuclear physicists) results. "Oh the physics equation was wrong, we just need to make everything 25% bigger".

Also, the emitted radiation levels will be insane once it's scaled up

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 day ago

I see you don't know how crypto works lol