299
We did the math on AI’s energy footprint. Here’s the story you haven’t heard. (www.technologyreview.com)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
156 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Absolutely needed: to get high efficiency for this beast ... as it gets better, we'll become too dependent.

"all of this growth is for a new technology that’s still finding its footing, and in many applications—education, medical advice, legal analysis—might be the wrong tool for the job,,,"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

As for OpenAI and Microsoft, they're betting on energy with a company called Helion Energy. They say they'll have it ready by 2028. Whether they'll achieve that? We'll see.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    I looked that up and it's a fusion reactor, apparently, from what I can figure out from their nigh-illegible website.

    ...[reads further] ...

    It skips the steam cycle. That's fucking cool. I really hope they get it working.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    They won't.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Care to elaborate?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    there's lots of handwavy things. They even said they "discovered new physics" to explain some disappointing (perfectly predictable, by other established nuclear physicists) results. "Oh the physics equation was wrong, we just need to make everything 25% bigger".

    Also, the emitted radiation levels will be insane once it's scaled up

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent