▲ 218 ▼ Chicago Sun-Times prints summer reading list full of fake books (arstechnica.com) submitted 1 year ago by PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world 23 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) If I'm a media enterprise, probably, yeah. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] vaguerant@fedia.io 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Perhaps I wasn't clear. The journalists and editorial staff at the Chicago Sun-Times aren't media enterprises, they are human persons. I'm not asking you to imagine yourself as a corporation, I'm asking you to imagine that you are a person. If you were a person and your boss did something bad without your knowledge or consent, are you, a person, to blame for your boss' actions? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago No, I understand what you mean and to that point yes you're right I shouldn't hold the employees of the Chicago Sun-Times accountable for using AI slop in their paper. But that's just not the way my - or anyone's - mind processes it. "The Chicago Sun-Times" for all intents and purposes is a monolith which produces a newspaper. "They" made a very unfortunate decision to allow AI content in that paper. It has damaged their reputation. So next time I see "Chicago Sun-Times" I won't be thinking about the person who does the layouts or the regional sales person or any of that, I'll be thinking "oh yeah, they got bitten hard by a stupid decision to allow AI slop in their paper". permalink fedilink source parent
[–] vaguerant@fedia.io 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Perhaps I wasn't clear. The journalists and editorial staff at the Chicago Sun-Times aren't media enterprises, they are human persons. I'm not asking you to imagine yourself as a corporation, I'm asking you to imagine that you are a person. If you were a person and your boss did something bad without your knowledge or consent, are you, a person, to blame for your boss' actions? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago No, I understand what you mean and to that point yes you're right I shouldn't hold the employees of the Chicago Sun-Times accountable for using AI slop in their paper. But that's just not the way my - or anyone's - mind processes it. "The Chicago Sun-Times" for all intents and purposes is a monolith which produces a newspaper. "They" made a very unfortunate decision to allow AI content in that paper. It has damaged their reputation. So next time I see "Chicago Sun-Times" I won't be thinking about the person who does the layouts or the regional sales person or any of that, I'll be thinking "oh yeah, they got bitten hard by a stupid decision to allow AI slop in their paper". permalink fedilink source parent
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago No, I understand what you mean and to that point yes you're right I shouldn't hold the employees of the Chicago Sun-Times accountable for using AI slop in their paper. But that's just not the way my - or anyone's - mind processes it. "The Chicago Sun-Times" for all intents and purposes is a monolith which produces a newspaper. "They" made a very unfortunate decision to allow AI content in that paper. It has damaged their reputation. So next time I see "Chicago Sun-Times" I won't be thinking about the person who does the layouts or the regional sales person or any of that, I'll be thinking "oh yeah, they got bitten hard by a stupid decision to allow AI slop in their paper". permalink fedilink source parent