this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2025
243 points (97.3% liked)

World News

47813 readers
2918 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Satellite imagery taken after the US strike on Iran's Fordow site showed smoke rising from the fuel enrichment plant. US President Donald Trump claimed key Iranian nuclear sites had been "obliterated," while Iran claimed it had removed nuclear material from the sites before the strikes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I thought we needed to use nukes to penetrate their nuclear sites. Either that was a lie or these attacks did not do what Trump is saying it did.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 18 points 2 days ago

I read they didn't knew if it's going to work or not. They still don't know if it worked. Trump says it worked because he's Trump.

[–] Pringles@sopuli.xyz 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The US used 14 of their largest bunker busters (GBU-57) at the Fordow facility. That's as close as you can get to nuclear without actual nukes. Source: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jun/22/how-effective-was-the-us-attack-on-irans-nuclear-sites-a-visual-guide

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Bunker busters only have about 2300kg of payload, the rest of the weight is the penetrator body.

The bombs are rated at destroying a 20m radius.

There is some evidence that these penetrators can be guided away from targets by clever architecture. (A reinforced diamond cross-swcrioned concrete beam for instance can guide the penetrator away from its target)

Long story short we don't know if these did anything.

Here is the presentation that talks about it https://youtu.be/TriASB-F5UY

[–] perestroika@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Bunker busters only have about 2kg of payload,

Nope. Please note: when an American writes 2.082 lb, he's not meaning 2 pounds and tidbits. He's meaning 2000 pounds. AFX and PBXN are not glitter, they're explosives. :)

Filling AFX-757/PBXN-114

Filling weight 4,590 / 752 lb (2,082 / 341 kg)

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Yep I meant 2000kg apparently. Thanks for the correction