you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 16 points 2 years ago* (11 children)

To be fair

"If you don't play by our rules you can't do business with us!"

Is how our European market works as well right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    It could be argued, I guess?

    But to impose arbitrary (and contrary to democracy itself) rules overnight and expect everyone to follow suit instead of negotiating a solution? No fucking way.

    Maybe I should have put it differently:

    “If you don’t run your business by our fascist rules right now you can’t do business with us!”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Well the difference is that EU tries to impose fair rules that will benefit (or hurt, as is too often the case) everyone equally, while Trump wants to impose unfair rules that only benefit US corporations and himself.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    No, the EU has a habit of protectionism disguised as legitimate interest. I recall a case study from when I was in high school, where the EU set the safety limits on a certain contaminant in a product—peanuts, I think it was—way, way stricter than any evidentiary basis, because EU farms could meet the restriction, but African or South American farms could not.

    It's hardly comparable to anything Trump is doing, but it's worth mentioning, since you did claim EU laws are all about affecting everyone equally.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago*

    They also paid for a study on how digital piracy affects profits and then buried it when the result showed that it didn't have a negative impact.

    The EU cares about the EU and its wealth, not its citizens. It's still a big step up over the land of the free-to-sell-its-citizens-wellbeing-to-the-corporations, though.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    This deserves a post of its own.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Maybe, but it's hardly news. I graduated highschool well over a decade ago, and the case study I mentioned was not exactly new when I was studying economics in school.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment