this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
90 points (97.9% liked)

Fuck AI

3437 readers
1535 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

There have been multiple things which have gone wrong with AI for me but these two pushed me over the brink. This is mainly about LLMs but other AI has also not been particularly helpful for me.

Case 1

I was trying to find the music video from where a screenshot was taken.

I provided o4 mini the image and asked it where it is from. It rejected it saying that it does not discuss private details. Fair enough. I told it that it is xyz artist. It then listed three of their popular music videos, neither of which was the correct answer to my question.

Then I started a new chat and described in detail what the screenshot was. It once again regurgitated similar things.

I gave up. I did a simple reverse image search and found the answer in 30 seconds.

Case 2

I wanted a way to create a spreadsheet for tracking investments which had xyz columns.

It did give me the correct columns and rows but the formulae for calculations were off. They were almost correct most of the time but almost correct is useless when working with money.

I gave up. I manually made the spreadsheet with all the required details.

Why are LLMs so wrong most of the time? Aren’t they processing high quality data from multiple sources? I just don’t understand the point of even making these softwares if all they can do is sound smart while being wrong.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Outwit1294@lemmy.today 0 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, but all these things were actually filtered out by money. It took a while but it happened.

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not sure I understand, then, what you mean by "filtered out by money". If you mean "they collapsed eventually because they were idiotic ideas" then, well, yes. But they lasted for a long time before doing so and caused incalculable damage in the process. The tulip bulb craze (one of the earliest speculative crazes) lasted about 4 years. The subprime mortgage disaster took 8 years. The NFT fiasco lasted about 2 years. The dot-com bubble took 7 years to play out. The Japan real estate bubble was about 5 years.

We're only 3 years or so into the LLMbecile bubble. If you want to think of bubble collapses as "filtered out by money" we've got anywhere from next week to 2029 for the collapse.

[–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 hours ago

pretty sure that economists were able to calculate the damage caused by the last market crash. the market being permanently changed is inherently a correction force on the market