this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2025
67 points (85.3% liked)

Fuck AI

3842 readers
871 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I am wonder why leftists are in general hostile towards AI. I am not saying this is wrong or right, I just would like someone to list/summarize the reasons.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 128 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It steals from the copyright holders in order to make corporate AI money without giving back to the creators.

It uses insane amounts of water and energy to function, with demand not being throttled by these companies.

It gives misleading, misquoted, misinformed, and sometimes just flat out wrong information, but abuses its very confidence-inspiring language skills to pass it off as the correct answer. You HAVE to double check all its work.

And if you think about it, it doesn't actually want to lick a lollipop, even if it says it does. Its not sentient. I repeat, its not alive. The current design is a tool at best.

[–] 33550336@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago

Thank you, for the sake of completeness, I'd add something like this: https://time.com/6247678/openai-chatgpt-kenya-workers/

[–] NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It steals from the copyright holders in order to make corporate AI money without giving back to the creators.

This is a liberal criticism, not a leftist one. Leftists do not believe in private property, let alone expanding private property to include ideas as "intellectual property"

A leftist framing of this critique is that one of the primary objectives of LLMs is to bring publicly accessible information, i.e. the commons, into the realm of private property, where one must exchange one's personal data (read: power) to access what already exists in the commons.

Namely, the scraping required for LLM training can be considered exploitation of workers for profit. Workers or volunteers created, wrote, organized, or edited the content. Content that is now used to generate a profit, profit that the workers never see a penny of. This content is repackaged and sold back to the workers.

[–] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Shit, my bad. I read it as left-leaning viewpoints, not leftist viewpoints.

[–] NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

You read correctly. Just wanted to clarify for posterity. :)