Canada

10355 readers

509 users here now

What's going on Canada?

Related Communities

🍁 Meta

🗺️ Provinces / Territories

🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.

🏒 Sports

Hockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Toronto Blue Jays

Basketball

Toronto Raptors

Soccer

Main: /c/CanadaSoccer
Toronto FC

💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.

💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales

🗣️ Politics

General:
- Canada Politics
- FairVote Canada
Federal Parties (alphabetical):
- Animal Protection Party of Canada
- NDP
By Province (alphabetical):
- BC Greens

🍁 Social / Culture

Rules

Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

223

Air Canada union says flight attendants will continue strike, defy government (www.reuters.com)

submitted 1 week ago by HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works to c/canada@lemmy.ca

30 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Air Canada flight attendants said on Sunday they will remain on strike and challenge a return-to-work order they called unconstitutional, defying a government decision to force them back to their duties by 2 p.m. ET (1800 GMT).

Air Canada had said it planned to resume flights on Sunday evening, a day after the Canadian government issued a directive to end a cabin crew strike that caused the suspension of around 700 daily flights, stranding more than 100,000 passengers.

The Canadian Union of Public Employees said in a statement that members would remain on strike and invited Air Canada back to the table to "negotiate a fair deal."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] jaemo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Okay, but being unbiased abd free of potential conflicts of interest are, to me, mitigating factors.

I don't subscribe to justice via my hunches, and do not want my country to either.

Edit: is it your assertion that any other judge we've appointed, having been properly briefed with respect to the relevant facts in both parties, would be unqualified? If so, should your ire not be better directed at the glaring inefficiencies in our purportedly completely ineffective justice system?

[–] baconmonsta@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago

No it's not my assertion. I'm just offering an another way of looking at it. It's still possibly a pure conflict of interest. I guess with limited information you never know