What about similar oddities in English?
(This question is inspired by this comic by https://www.exocomics.com/193/ (link found by BunScientist@lemmy.zip)) Edit: it's to its in the title. Damn autocorrect.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 15 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Pretty much only native speakers have problems with this, I see this type of mistake far less frequently with those who learned English as an additional language.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Exactly. People with English as a second language go from meaning to writing. Native speakers go from sound to writing.

    There, their, they’re is something native speakers confuse as well. I have only ever observed native speaker write should of instead of should‘ve or should have.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Pretty much only native speakers have problems with this

    That makes no sense since they would use it more, however native speakers from the US do have problems with it, and other words (they're/their).

    Rarely encounter it with others.
    Their spelling is embarrassing, same as their very limited vocabulary. IDK what they do in schools.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    Modern people are the written word as more valid than spoken

    Now there's a sentence I can't make sense of.

    There is no influence of history in when kids learn to write their language or if they used it orally, they learn to write it then how it's supposed to be written.
    If your reasons were valid every Anglo would have problems, they don't.
    Since it's noticably the US specifically I can only assume it's sub standard education.
    As confirmed by their poor vocabulary compared to other Anglo's

  • source
  • parent