this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
16 points (90.0% liked)
Fuck AI
2518 readers
710 users here now
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Quite interesting, even though the dataset clearly favors generated art.
What do you mean by that? I think there are 25 of both.
Yes, but genereated pictures are deliberetly chosen to contain less elements that "AI" struggles with and human made ones contain quite a bit of bad anatomy ones just to confuse you. It also contains abstract art, which literally strips proper shapes from drawn objects and calls it a stylistic choice.
What I'm getting at is that it's not a random selection from both categories, they were hand picked. And in my opinion, the selection methodology favors generated art.
Gotcha. Yeah, it's definitely a curated selection of artwork. I don't think it's really fair to say that the human art is all that unrepresentative -- yeah there are some intentional red herrings, like the greek text -- but I think the most ambiguously AI-looking human art is the abstract stuff or the stuff that is in genres that AI is commonly used for e.g. anime girls. But the AI art is definitely chosen to be above average; most of them pass the filter of stuff the ACX author didn't immediately recognize as for sure AI. So it's not like this is test is a particularly objective measure. I think it's still fun though.