cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/58368644

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 106 points 8 months ago (7 children)

Good policy for bad (or at least not principled) reasons. It’s for money. They consider Israel “high risk” because of the war. China doesn’t give a shit about human rights. They send their own Muslims to concentration camps.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    True. It's a state. I can't think of a time a state did something for purely altruistic reasons.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago*

    Historically the US funded a lot of important medical research. Do you think they did this for altruistic reasons?

    Similarly, healthcare is beneficial to the state to keep workers healthy.

    States do many things, good and bad, but none just out of the goodness of their hearts.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    It's also to say they have principles. It's hard for the USA or Europe to criticize their human rights abuses while continuing to support Israel. It's a way to highlight western hypocrisy while avoiding risk. Remember they still invest into other high risk countries. High risk can lead to high reward.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments