484
Turns Out There Was Voter Fraud in Georgia—by Elon Musk (newrepublic.com)
submitted 7 months ago by to c/progressivepolitics@lemmy.world
66 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

If Donald Trump’s administration really wants to find evidence of foreign interference in Georgia’s elections, then they need look no further than the president’s old friend Elon Musk and his shady super PAC.

Members of the Georgia State Elections Board voted Wednesday to issue a formal letter of reprimand to Musk’s America PAC over the billionaire technocrat’s illegal scheme to get Trump elected. Georgia, a key battleground state in 2024, was the target of aggressive campaigning by Trump’s team.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 7 months ago (7 children)

I'll believe it when I see actual evidence. So far I've seen nothing that's even remotely convincing.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Given the various polls before and after the election it shouldn't have been surprising. Trump hit on economic issues hard while Harris was doubling down on Bidens policies which, right or wrong, most people blamed for the inflation. Harris did fuck up though by not requesting a recount in at least the 3 closest contests. We should normalize verification of results without accusations of fraud.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    Yes, that's the other side of the coin. The DNC fucked up so badly in many ways, and it wasn't their first time.

    It's complicated. Some polls said Harris would win, along with Allan Lichtman who has been right about every election since 1984. However there are other signs that Trump was going to win. Also further complicated that Trump has a 30 year history of cheating and lying to win, and he and Musk would do everything in their power to not go to prison. Also also, Russia/China/Iran love to stoke and accelerate internal divisions by pushing election denial conspiracies. So overall, there's a lot of variables here and I would sleep better with PA having done a full hand recount (though I know that won't actual happen).

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah, like I said, those are massive claims. I'm an experienced data scientist and I've followed ETA's methods and results, and even debated with another internet election science guy about it. On the surface ETA's data looks like evidence of something fucky, but digging a little deeper shows some potential odd methods they choose to represent stuff and not enough baseline data analysis to compare against their anomalous data analysis.

    Still, I fully believe they tried to cheat given their character and long history of cheating in every aspect of life, so I'm withholding final judgement until the lawsuits are born out.

    Would you support a hand recount in PA? I still would, just to put the whole issue to bed once and for all.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Sure, no reason not to count again as long as it's open and honest. But I personally doubt they will find anything major. It's not that I don't think Trump would cheat, but it's hard to do and harder to get away with.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago

    Devil's advocate: if they had access to the software that's on the network-connected machines, of only 2 major brands, wouldn't that make it easier to install malware?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent