▲ 317 ▼ People who are staying on Plex, have you tried Jellyfin? What about it do you not prefer? (real question) (discuss.online) submitted 4 months ago by kiol@discuss.online to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world 457 comments fedilink hide all child comments Honest question, because I know multiple people who are not looking to jump ship since they already have the Plex Pass.
[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 3 points 4 months ago (5 children) No, it’s not the sunk cost fallacy lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children) Not sure if you're trolling or you just had a brain-fart 🤔 Happens sometimes. Maybe think about it a little more. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 points 4 months ago (3 children) The sunk cost fallacy is when you keep sinking more money into something because of how much you have already sunk into it. It doesn’t apply when you simply make a one-off purchase and then don’t ever spend another cent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children) no. What you describe is just one form of the fallacy. Sunk cost fallacy in general is when you include a sunk cost in your decision making process at all, instead of just considering the costs and benefits that are affected by the decision at present. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 points 4 months ago (1 child) No, what I described is the sunk cost fallacy. You misunderstood it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago No I didn't. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children) Not sure if you're trolling or you just had a brain-fart 🤔 Happens sometimes. Maybe think about it a little more. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 points 4 months ago (3 children) The sunk cost fallacy is when you keep sinking more money into something because of how much you have already sunk into it. It doesn’t apply when you simply make a one-off purchase and then don’t ever spend another cent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children) no. What you describe is just one form of the fallacy. Sunk cost fallacy in general is when you include a sunk cost in your decision making process at all, instead of just considering the costs and benefits that are affected by the decision at present. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 points 4 months ago (1 child) No, what I described is the sunk cost fallacy. You misunderstood it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago No I didn't. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 points 4 months ago (3 children) The sunk cost fallacy is when you keep sinking more money into something because of how much you have already sunk into it. It doesn’t apply when you simply make a one-off purchase and then don’t ever spend another cent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children) no. What you describe is just one form of the fallacy. Sunk cost fallacy in general is when you include a sunk cost in your decision making process at all, instead of just considering the costs and benefits that are affected by the decision at present. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 points 4 months ago (1 child) No, what I described is the sunk cost fallacy. You misunderstood it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago No I didn't. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children) no. What you describe is just one form of the fallacy. Sunk cost fallacy in general is when you include a sunk cost in your decision making process at all, instead of just considering the costs and benefits that are affected by the decision at present. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 points 4 months ago (1 child) No, what I described is the sunk cost fallacy. You misunderstood it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago No I didn't. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 points 4 months ago (1 child) No, what I described is the sunk cost fallacy. You misunderstood it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago No I didn't. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago No I didn't. permalink fedilink source parent