you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 42 points 4 months ago (19 children)

Sure, but if they say you have to be in control at all times to pass blame then they need to call it driver assist or something other than "full self driving".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (9 children)

    They can call it whatever they want, the bottom line is that a human is behind the wheel and ultimately they're responsible.

    And I think it has been well established at this point that fsd isn't ready yet, that it's not safe. The fact that they call it "full self driving" is cute... but it's marketing, it's not a get out of jail free card.

    Edit: Hah. So many down votes! Well go ahead, down vote personal responsibility! I mean, suggesting maybe people are responsible for the choices they make, fuck me right!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 4 months ago (8 children)

    Tesla should be held at least partially responsible for being intentionally misleading in how they named their fancy cruise control.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago* (7 children)
  • [+] -4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (6 children)
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    actually watch the damn video, tesla has gotten worse not better lol

    so everyone else over the last two years getting better just makes the gap worse

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)
  • [+] -13 points 4 months ago (8 children)

    Okay, so the name sucks, but if my kid breaks her laptop, I still gotta pay it. I didn't break it. The kid broke it. But it's still my responsibility.

    I don't have a kid. If I did, I'd hope I had a kid who wouldn't break nice things. But, let's be real. Kids and cats break nice things. I also don't have a Tesla. But if you own something (or you have a pet or a child) you are still responsible for what they do.

    It's going to be interesting if we ever get those cars that go out on our behalf and do ride sharing gigs while we're at work, earning back the money they spend keeping themselves charged. I wanna say one of the EV makers floated that idea. It never happened. But if it did, while you're at work your car does damage. Who are they going to blame? Maybe you have insurance that covers it. But you'd still be responsible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    yeah if its named absolutely no liabilty to you we will take all the blame because we guarantee our car has full self driving capability. well thats just a name. it does not mean anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    except the name is literally fraud

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    You may want to familiarize yourself with marketing, before you indict half the economy.

    But the name is “Fill Self Driving (Supervised)”. See, no fraud, just a balance of marketing and legaleze, lying and technicalities

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment