you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 13 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Why not? Pre-humans were not smart enough to recognise that having children would cause the children to suffer. Perhaps it would be better to simply die out as a species. It all depends on how you view morality and how you weigh non-existence

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    If it depends on how you view it, then it's not a moral obligation, it's a personal preference. Which is fine, but just acknowledge that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)

    Except morality is subjective and thus inherently dependent upon how one views it. There is no such thing as "objective morality". Morales are always about personal preferences.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments