top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 65 points 2 months ago (14 children)

Not to mention the clear financial aspect

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 months ago (13 children)

    This is a much better reason, frankly.

    "I couldn't bring a child into a world like this" is a bit of mental gymnastics that people use to convince themselves that they're being noble and selfless with this decision, when in reality it's neither noble nor ignoble, neither selfless nor selfish. Every child eventually hits their parents with the classic "I never asked to be born!", and while it's certainly true, NOBODY asks to be born, and life has ALWAYS sucked in some way or another. Should pre-humans have refused to have kids because it would be cruel to bring them into a world where they have to kill to eat? Nonsense.

    If people simply don't want to have kids, they should simply say that and own it. They don't OWE it to anybody to have kids - but they don't owe it to anybody to not have kids, either. It's not a moral decision in either direction. It's simply a case that some people don't feel up to the responsibility, and that's fine: not superior, just fine.

    And before anyone says that not having kids helps to keep the surplus population down: no problem on Earth is a result of the population being too high. There's enough food for everyone; the problem is distribution. There's enough land for everyone; the problem is that some people are hoarding. If the population starts using renewables and just generally going green, corporations build more data centers and invent other novel ways to waste resources.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    no problem on Earth is a result of the population being too high.

    Pre-industrial humans caused mass habitat loss, species extinction, and even climate change, and that was with their relatively miniscule populations and emissions. What quality of life are you imagining over eight billion people having such that we somehow don't continue wrecking the environment? And how do you plan on putting the genie back in the bottle regarding all our polluting technological "advancements" that require fossil fuels and/or intensive mining? Who's declaring to the world that plastics, electricity, and all forms of motorized technology are over, and how do you imagine this would be enforced?

    Even completely stripped of all our technology, humans are still animals, and any animal species will wreak havoc on their environment when overpopulated. Hell you don't even have to be an animal; go look up the Great Oxygenation Event or what happened when trees first evolved. What do you suppose Earth is going to be like for the millions of years required for it to adapt to the changes we're making? Unlike monocellular organisms and plants, however, we are sapient creatures; if we can observe this is happening and know we're the ones causing it, how is it not in any way a moral issue?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 56 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    In the US you can't even buy vegetables right now without worrying about getting explosive diarrhea. Just the thing you want for your children.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Our government is just trying to help the people of America by tackling the obesity crisis with this all natural ozempic alternative!

    /s (if it wasn't obvious)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 35 points 2 months ago (22 children)

    Do you have any idea how much you have to abuse a living being for it to consciously not want to have kids?

    And we achieved this level of abuse on humans! And we did it very well, in reproducible way, with reproducible results across multiple countries! We should make a research paper about it.

  • source
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (21 children)

    Nah,

    I just think that they're annoying, and they would absolutely ruin my life

    There's not a single thing that appeals about having children. Everything I enjoy would be ruined by them

    I wasn't beaten or abused by society. I live in a civilised part of the world, rather than the shit show that is 'Murica

    It's not neccesary to invent grand reasons for not breeding

    I just didn't want to

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • load more comments (21 replies)
  • [–] 34 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    I was looking at the costs of raising a child the other day and I don't know how anyone does it. My job pays garbage with trash health insurance.

    I'm just so mad at the management class with their high pay and not doing any actual work. My boss seems fine - I think he knows this is bullshit and goes a little out of his way to make it easier for me. But everyone above him? If I saw them drowning I'd have to think a long time before throwing a life vest.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    They don't want to make it more affordable to have children so that women are forced to drop out of the workforce to stay home and raise them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 2 months ago (11 children)

    Generally agree, but where did the air quality decrease compared to some decades back?

    (80s kid here, so maybe my brain is to slow to realize it, because of the remains still in my bloodstreams of the lead fumes and unfiltered coal power plant exhausts I inhaled back then...)

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    It didn't. Air quality is substantially better world wide, there are better, real indicators of how bad the state of the world is the artist could have used. But also far more metrics about how better the world is, which no one ever likes to talk about. Way less extreme poverty, way less starvation, way less war, way more access to clean water, way more vaccinations, etc. The problem is the ultra rich are making life worse for the majority of privileged people, and we are really feeling it. But worldwide, humanity is objectively leaps and bounds better than it was 100 years ago

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

    But its also air pollutants like smoke particles and car fumes. I'm genuinely thinking of taking the bus today instead of biking because I don't want to kill my lungs.

    Update: In case anyone reads this. The Canadian wildfire smoke moved into my city and completely blocks sight within a mile, I couldn't see the two biggest buildings (not to mention the huge but smaller towers) in downtown from a bridge I bike across everyday. When I tried breathing through my mouth all I could taste was smoke, so I solely breathed through my nose.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 26 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    So, let's say you have a system where people go to work, do their job, and get paid. The employer wants more productivity, so the work becomes more stressful ("a full workload"). The worker does more for less, the company celebrates.

    There is a hidden element here: stress. Your workers will be more productive, however their baseline stress levels will rise over time. It's cumulative and takes years to show; but it means everyone above a certain age who works a well paying job has a high stress burden. A lot of people live without any job security.

    Stressed organisms do not reproduce.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    But imagine if your kid would be so special they could invent solution to all these problems!

    /s

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 24 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    There are a whole lot more reasons to NOT have kids imo.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 22 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    I was educated not to leave trash around when I visited nature.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 20 points 2 months ago

    all true, but...

    we enjoy our free time, hobbies, and traveling the world? want more of that not zero.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 2 months ago (17 children)

    I just don't want kids. Knew I never wanted to be a parent ever since I was a kid having to help my parents raise my nephews and niece. I could be a billionaire and every problem on Earth could be solved, I still wouldn't have kids.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago

    I really want being childfree to be normalised. The world will be a much better place when the only people having children are the ones who genuinely want to be parents. I'll never understand why some people get so mad at the idea of others just not wanting to have kids.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    This, + my health is awful (so I'm not going to subject another being to a rerun of my suffering), and πŸ’• boys πŸ’•

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [+] 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 13 points 2 months ago (10 children)

    More propaganda so it's easier to strip women of their autonomy and access to contraception.

    It's not a crisis that the birth rate is falling.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 12 points 2 months ago*

    because my life is ruined shitheap of misery and i dont have the emotional capacity to deal with kids, the financial capacity to afford kids, and my genetics are a ticking timebomb that i really wouldnt want to inflict on kids the way it was inflicted on me.

    and lets not even get into the world itself and how its a festering cesspit on teetering on the edge of fascistic ruin because an elite group of corrupt billionaires don't want to ever give up their dragon hordes, or their ability to fuck infants and toddlers.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago

    Implying the politicians in the government are capable of feeling shame?

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I was raised in a very dysfunctional household. I broke free, met an amazing partner, and we both wanted children. I finally have the opportunity to be a kid again with them, provide them the childhood I never had and be apart of it, by having the childhood I never had. My kids are 9 & 11… and we are slowly having to pull back on fun active activities outdoors during the summer months because the environment is getting worse and worse year over year…

    I broke the cycle, but their childhood is slowly being robbed of them.

    Record rain in my area to where water drainage infrastructure is being destroyed bit by bit every fucking night. Massive tornado inducing storms where we normally don’t see them (a freak event killed a bunch of people and destroyed nearly a billion dollars in property back in the 80s, nothing since and nothing before). Record amount of tornados in my Province, humid as fuck when I live in the prairies. Smokey unbeatable air because of the one area not getting rain burning down.

    I want off this ride.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 10 points 2 months ago

    This is fine

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago

    Idk how you'd draw lower wages and less fulfilling jobs, but that too.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago* (4 children)

    The short answer is: I don't want to.

    The longer answer is: I really, seriously, don't want to.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 7 points 2 months ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next β€Ί