241
San Francisco restaurant gets angry backlash for AI menu images (www.sfgate.com)
submitted 2 months ago by to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
76 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 2 months ago (6 children)

I think that depends if there's small print saying it's a rendering or sth

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    I'm not sure that's allowed - https://verityrise.com/food-advertising-laws/#Core_Provisions_of_Food_Advertising_Laws

    Based on my read, the advertised product must be real and sold in the store and must match the product being sold.

    I'm sure some random mom and pop stores are unlikely to get called on it, but it seems AI generated images wouldn't be allowed (but I'm not a lawyer).

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (3 children)

    Based on my read, the advertised product must be real and sold in the store and must match the product being sold.

    How does McDonalds get away with it?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    They might food setters. There are specific rules about showing everything that is in the food but it doesnt have to be displayed as sold. So you can undertook it so it looks better. Use fresher stuff or push all the meat to the front and prop up the back with toothpicks. But it must contain the same stuff as sold. Its weird rules. But ai images surely break the rules.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent