you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 2 months ago (1 child)

Using the Britannica definition of Imperialism is like using the IDF definition of antisemitism. It isn't actually very persuasive, bcs it gives you away as either a shill for the existing world order or a useful idiot for the same.

Imperialism is the stage of capitalism where finance capital overtakes commodity production. That's a gross oversimplification, but it'll do for the level of debate in this thread.

https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1916/imp-hsc/imperialism.pdf

Neither China nor Russia is an Imperialist power because in neither state has capitalist control over markets led to the rise of finance capital overtaking commodity production as the main basis of the economy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment