▲ 318 ▼ Why Normal People Aren’t Using AI Agents (www.wired.com) submitted 2 months ago by FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works to c/technology@lemmy.world 192 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 months ago (2 children) The point is to replace you not help you permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) I think their point is that they just go into tangentially different workflows and do work you didn't ask them to or need them to do. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago Yeah. My point though is that's on purpose. The tools being built are not meant to help workers. It's meant to replace them. Which it can't really do. Which is why none of this makes sense and everyone is flailing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) I think their point is that they just go into tangentially different workflows and do work you didn't ask them to or need them to do. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago Yeah. My point though is that's on purpose. The tools being built are not meant to help workers. It's meant to replace them. Which it can't really do. Which is why none of this makes sense and everyone is flailing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago Yeah. My point though is that's on purpose. The tools being built are not meant to help workers. It's meant to replace them. Which it can't really do. Which is why none of this makes sense and everyone is flailing. permalink fedilink source parent