you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 129 points 5 days ago (11 children)

Giving LLMs credit for all machine learning is problematic

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 5 days ago

    This is their go to motte-and-Bailey argument fallacy. Say something outlandish, get called out on it, retreat behind something more reasonable and how no one notices before sallying forth with unreasonable claims again.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 27 points 5 days ago (6 children)

    Yeah machine learning for medical research has been around for a lot longer than LLMs. LLMs do not do medical research, they are just really expensive and fancy "next word" auto-correct generators.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 5 days ago* (4 children)

    I'd argue they made scentific research harder due to the many fake papers you can find onlime

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 days ago* (3 children)

    that's been a problem since 2005 at least (first time i did serious medical resesarch)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 days ago

    I remember way back when with the Folding at Home project. That's a type of machine learning distributed. People happily contributed their computer time. Hell, there were contests around how much compute time a particular group could give.

  • source
  • parent