358
Canada, France, Italy and Greece allow Netanyahu’s overflight despite ICC warrant (www.middleeasteye.net)
submitted 1 week ago by to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
147 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu flew over Greece, Italy, France and Canada on Thursday on his way to address the UN, despite an International Criminal Court warrant for his arrest.

The ICC issued an arrest warrant for Netanyahu in November 2024, on charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity allegedly committed in Gaza since October 2023.

Netanyahu arrived in the US for a short visit to address the UN General Assembly in New York, where Mayor Zohran Mamdani has said he does not have the authority to arrest the Israeli leader.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 1 week ago* (20 children)

Israel would literally cease to exist if it got in a war with France. Israel isn't going to war with fucking NATO

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
    •
  • [+] -8 points 1 week ago (19 children)

    France shooting down Netanyahu would be the end of NATO immediately. There would be no war with NATO because NATO wouldn’t exist anymore.

    A European nation assassinating Netanyahu would immediately plunge the entire Middle East into massive war, destroy the global market, and likely draw the US into war in Europe.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago (12 children)

    It's not an "assassination", dumbass.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
    •
  • [–] -5 points 1 week ago (11 children)

    It literally is an assassination.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago (10 children)

    It literally isn't, dumbass.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] -5 points 1 week ago (9 children)

    Not sure what else you would call killing the prime minister of a nation that you’re not at war with.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago (8 children)

    Legally enforcing your airspace is not an assassination and you know it, stop being deliberately obtuse.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] -5 points 1 week ago (7 children)

    Shooting down a civilian aircraft with a work leader on it would absolutely be an assassination.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago (6 children)

    No it wouldn't, and you know it

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] -4 points 1 week ago (5 children)

    Yes it absolutely would lmao. No European country is at war with Israel. Every European country recognizes Israel as a sovereign nation.

    It would be an assassination and an act of war.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    Every European country recognizes Israel as a sovereign nation.

    I'm genuinely curious what you think the relevance of this is.

    Given that you're so stupid you think a country enforcing their air space is both assassination and an act of war, I'm assuming your answer is going to be more nonsense though

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] -4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    What’s the relevance of one nation killing the leader of another nation that they internationally recognize as a sovereign nation?

    Shooting down an aircraft is far beyond standard airspace enforcement. Standard airspace enforcement would be to send fighter jets to escort the violating aircraft out of the airspace without conflict.

    Shooting down an aircraft would absolutely be an act of war.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Shooting down an aircraft is far beyond standard airspace enforcement. Standard airspace enforcement would be to send fighter jets to escort the violating aircraft out of the airspace without conflict.

    Which you've already said they can't do because the plane could just ignore them. What do you think is the next step when a violating plane ignores the fighters?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    You think the population of the US would want to go to war with France over the leader of a genocidal pariah state being downed legally?

    What's the support for the war with Iran again?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] -7 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    And just like your second example, public support wouldn’t matter in the slightest. We’re literally at war with Iran right now with basically nobody supporting it.

    But France would have no allies even in Europe if they assassinated a Western leader like Netanyahu. They’d be a global pariah for plunging the world into a depression that would make the Great Depression look like child’s play.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago

    I dunno if you've been paying attention, but that's already happening because America is doing what Israel wants. If anyone stepped up to stop America or Israel in the slightest, we would avoid catastrophic depression.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago* (2 children)

    How did we go from the mandated air denial by international law to shooting down an aircraft?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -3 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    What’s your proposed response when said aircraft doesn’t follow your air denial and enters your airspace anyway?

    There’s only two options. You either send fighters up and follow them until they leave, or you enforce said denial and shoot the aircraft down.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •